Search for: "In re: S.D" Results 121 - 140 of 1,566
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2022, 2:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I have noted in prior posts on this site, the surge in special purpose acquisition corporation (SPAC) IPO transactions over the last two years has also meant a wave of SPAC-related lawsuits. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am by Eric Goldman
The number #1 question I get whenever I discuss FOSTA with folks who aren’t familiar with it: did Congress know what it was doing? [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
  The case, In Re Valsartan, Losartan, and Irbesartan Products Liability Litigation (US DC NJ) MDL No. 2875 (RBK)is a products liability case that concerns the sale in the U.S. of generic, prescription Valsartan pharmaceuticals, found by the Food and Drug Administration [“FDA”] to contain cancer‐causing contaminants. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
Supp. 2d 992, 1199–1200 (E.D.N.Y. 2006), rev’d on other grounds, 522 F.3d 215 (2d Cir. 2008) (describing confounding in studies of low-tar cigarettes, where authors failed to account for confounding and assessing healthier life styles in users) Third Circuit In re Zoloft Prods. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Defendants accused (perhaps wrongly) of serious misconduct Many defendants could be ruined simply by being publicly accused of certain offenses (rape, sexual harassment, embezzlement, fraud, malpractice, and the like)—or can be materially harmed even by being sued for more minor matters, such as in landlords' unlawful detainer actions against tenants. [1] Even if they know they're innocent, they might agree to settle as a means of avoiding the lawsuit even being filed, thus… [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
We lawyers have to keep such secrets about people as part of our jobs, but we're used to it, and we're handsomely compensated for it. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
This may be a reason why such mutual pseudonymity is so rare.[12]   [1] In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 97 (D.C. [read post]