Search for: "In re Amend. to R. Governing Admission to the Bar"
Results 121 - 140
of 153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
And will the movement lead to increasing reciprocity for bar admissions? [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Naturally, we’re most interested in the recall cases involving prescription medical products. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Naturally, we’re most interested in the recall cases involving prescription medical products. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Naturally, we’re most interested in the recall cases involving prescription medical products. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Dauphin Co. 1999).Naturally, we're most interested in the recall cases involving prescription medical products. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
Jun. 26, 2009)(Medina) (claim based on construction defect causing water damage barred by statute of repose) (statute of repose vs. statute of limitations) GALBRAITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(Canadian Trademark Blog) CIPO to open public consultation period regarding proposed changes to section 45 proceedings (Canadian Trademark Blog) Kraft and Euro-Excellence settle copyright case concerning parallel importation of chocolate bars (Excess Copyright) Toronto Star investigates textbook copying (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) CBC on public domain (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) Art Gallery of Ontario photography policy faces criticism over restriction based on misleading… [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Mukasey, No. 07-60740 Petition for review of a final order of removal is denied where: 1) a prior cancellation of removal did not erase petitioner's conviction for possession of marijuana for immigration purposes, and that conviction was admissible in the removal proceeding; and 2) petitioner's equal-protection challenge failed because he did not demonstrate that he was similarly situated to other aliens who were granted admission. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
R. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
R. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Bissonnette, No. 081094 In a conviction for first degree murder, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that: 1) the trial judge's instruction to the jury that the prosecution "does not have the burden of proving that no one else may have committed the murder" was an error that was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent as stated in In re Winship; and 2) the trial court violated defendant's Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause… [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
R. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
R. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
R. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Belgium - eBay wins ruling against L’Oreal in dispute over liability for counterfeit goods sold in online auctions: (Managing Intellectual Property), (Counterfeit Chic), (IPKat), (Class 46), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica) US CAFC holds that copying free software without complying with license is copyright infringement: Robert Jacobsen v… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
: (Techdirt), Microsoft Research launches new tools for knowledge sharing: (creativecommons.org), Yet another star singer, Duffy, doesn’t mind file-sharing: (Techdirt) Events 20 August – Bill Patry speaking on copyright – Melbourne: (Patry Copyright Blog), (LawFont.com), 21 August – Bill Patry speaking on copyright – Canberra: (Patry Copyright Blog), (LawFont.com), 22 August – Bill Patry speaking on copyright – Sydney:… [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
R. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Orsburn, No. 07-2584, 07-2585 Convictions for mail fraud are affirmed, but the sentences vacated and the case remanded for re-sentencing where the trial court applied the wrong Guidelines sentence when it concluded that embezzling money from the government fell under section 2C1.1 of the Guidelines which covers frauds that incl [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
Fortunately, this unique view of the First Amendment didn't go anywhere:By its terms, the Act bars plaintiffs from courts for the adjudication of qualified civil liability actions, allowing access for only those actions that fall within the Act's exceptions. [read post]
