Search for: "In re Amendments to the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules"
Results 121 - 140
of 279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2019, 12:26 pm
We are also participating in an Oklahoma state court case, Holcomb v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 5:49 am
When the Supreme Court ruled, in 1976, that bank records are categorically excluded from Fourth Amendment protection, the justices envisioned the piecemeal collection of records to assist criminal prosecutions. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:36 pm
Oklahoma (1988), in which international context played a role in the Court's holding that execution of a 15 year old would violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause of the 8th Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am
Gross, in which the Court upheld the use of midazolam in Oklahoma’s lethal injection protocol, have asked the Supreme Court to rehear their case on the basis of Justice Stephen Breyer’s call in his dissent for a full re-examination of capital punishment. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:45 am
SOTOMAYOR: ... enormous changes in our society, many, many cases looked at by the Supreme Court addressing the application of the death penalty, addressing issues of its application and when they're constitutional or not. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
In any event, today’s Supreme Court decision in Lane v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
We’ll see if the Supreme Court is persuaded. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm
(Fed courts aficionados may be more interested in the court's holding that the plaintiff has standing because, although courts can't enjoin the president to re-appoint somebody, they can order the president's subordinates to act as if he had re-appointed them.) [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 7:13 am
Tymkovich: the Supreme Court should review this. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
QUESTIONS PRESENTEDii LIST OF PARTIESPursuant to Supreme Court Rule 24.1(b), the following list identifies all of the parties before theKentucky Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor was a true trailblazer, serving as the first woman Supreme Court Justice and she was a rare Westerner on the Court, but she was hardly a maverick. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:44 am
At Constitution Daily, Lyle Denniston reports that, “[a]rguing that a state should not have to re-draw its congressional districts twice in a short time span, Maryland officials asked the Supreme Court on Monday to rule that the existing map can be used again in 2020 despite a lower court ruling that it is an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:42 am
Re-referred to House Judiciary Committee 5/20/11. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Along those lines, although the court’s ruling meant that any decisions in which the three commissioners participated while they were recess appointees would be invalid, nothing in the ruling suggested that it would invalidate other, earlier recess appointments. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am
Zimmerman lost his re-election bid. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:53 am
The court interprets Supreme Court precedent to mean that “the First Amendment may bar state law tort claims in certain factual circumstances when the alleged tortious conduct is speech on a matter of public concern in a public place or forum. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:16 pm
In 2008, the Supreme Court rejected an argument that Kentucky’s lethal injection procedures violated the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits “cruel and unusual punishment,” because of the possibility that the inmate could suffer serious pain if the procedures were not followed properly. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:31 am
Ra decision (nonprecedential), the Michigan Court of Appeals held that such threats are nondeadly force: Our Supreme Court … has applied the term "deadly force" as defined as force used in a circumstance in which the natural, probable, and foreseeable consequence of the act is death. [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:30 pm
Last week, relying on an IJ amicus, the Texas Supreme Court unanimously reversed a lower court ruling dismissing Patricia Mosley's argument that she should not be expected to know which of two conflicting procedural rules to follow when appealing an administrative judgment against her. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 12:30 pm
On Thursday, the Supreme Court released its decision in Brownback v. [read post]
