Search for: "In re Amendments to the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules"
Results 121 - 140
of 279
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Back then, the Supreme Court denied the petition without even relisting it. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
"We're the law, dawg. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am
The case would give the Supreme Court another opportunity to clarify the standing rule of Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am
Kentucky, 17-9467 Issues: (1) Whether the Kentucky Supreme Court violated the Eighth Amendment, as interpreted in Hall v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:44 am
At Constitution Daily, Lyle Denniston reports that, “[a]rguing that a state should not have to re-draw its congressional districts twice in a short time span, Maryland officials asked the Supreme Court on Monday to rule that the existing map can be used again in 2020 despite a lower court ruling that it is an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am
Zimmerman lost his re-election bid. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
If you’re reading a blog post that is entirely devoted to cases on the Supreme Court’s docket that haven’t even been granted yet, chances are you’re a law nerd. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 4:07 am
But he issued landmark rulings in the First Amendment, equal protection, and environmental cases. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
On Friday, the Supreme Court granted review in the twice-relisted Manhattan Community Access Corporation v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Virginia, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment bars the execution of the intellectually disabled, but did not define that term. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
Supreme Court struck down a law regulating the hours of bakery employees as a violation of economic liberty under due process clause of the 14th Amendment. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am
Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that public-sector unions may not force non-members to pay a percentage of union dues because doing so violates non-members’ First Amendment rights. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm
None of these rules of sentencing procedure is really in the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
Most observers understandably have focused on two major aspects of the ruling:(i) The Court held that customers have at least some "reasonable expectation of privacy" in the cell-site location information (CSLI) records that their service providers maintain about them--a new "exception" to the so-called "third-party doctrine," and thus a repudiation of the principle the Court announced in Smith v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
They’re running a little behind this year, so it looks like the last opinions will come down Tuesday or possibly even Wednesday of this week. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
The 9th Circuit, however, “recognize[d] that other circuits would likely not toll the Rule 23(f) deadline in Lambert’s case,” which may have gotten the Supreme Court’s attention. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
The Supreme Court has expressly held that there is a First Amendment right of access to criminal trials, Richmond Newspapers, 448 U.S. at 573, and courts have concluded that "the justifications for access to th [read post]
30 May 2018, 9:19 am
Munsingwear, Inc., the Supreme Court should vacate the U.S. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:36 am
Apache Tribe of Oklahoma (Indian Gaming; Diversity Jurisdiction) State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.html In re Williams (Michigan Indian Family Protection Act) People In Interest of I.B. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:54 pm
Apache Tribe of Oklahoma (Indian Gaming; Diversity Jurisdiction) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlIn re Williams (Michigan Indian Family Protection Act)People In Interest of I.B. [read post]
