Search for: "In re Answers Corporation Shareholders Litigation" Results 121 - 140 of 299
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This past year was an eventful one in the corporate and securities litigation arena, with the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:45 pm by Carl Neff
 There, a derivative complaint was brought against three directors of a Delaware corporation who approved transactions challenged in the litigation. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 11:21 am by John Jascob
Further, this type of broad bar would prohibit any shareholder, and even EZCORP itself, from litigating against the directors, regardless of what evidence may be discovered in the future. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
    For instance, after suffering a cyber-attack, a corporation must not only bear the substantial regulatory and litigation costs associated with potential privacy violations – that is just the tip of the iceberg. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Delaware Passes Law Banning Fee-Shifting Bylaws: The Delaware legislature overwhelmingly passed S.B. 75, which prohibits Delaware stock corporations from adopting “loser pays” fee-shifting bylaws and which confirms that Delaware corporations may adopt bylaws designating Delaware courts as the exclusive forum for shareholder litigation. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Is there an accurate and current network topology diagram that is adequately documented, and if so, is it periodically re-assessed and revised as internal systems and external factors change? [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 1:36 pm by Mack Sperling
Judge McGuire calculated it at a staggering $941.72 per hour (Order ¶35), which was triple the hourly fee the Business Court had approved in a previous class action (In re Harris Teeter Merger Litig., 2014 NCBC 44) and seven times the hourly fee awarded in another class action approval (In re Progress Energy Shareholder Litig., 2011 NCBC 44). [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 2:40 am by Florian Mueller
A permissive open source license for Swift is the answer... but what is the question? [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 9:17 am by Philip J. Berenz
Courts apply this equitable remedy to avoid improper use of corporate laws meant to shield innocent shareholders and to promote justice. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Pretty much what you expect: The majority shareholder and his attorneys must restore to the corporation all funds paid by the corporation to the law firm. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:12 am by Peter Mahler
In addition, the procedural aspects of the dissenting limited partner provisions in § 121-1105 expressly piggyback on the well-established procedures set forth in § 623 of the Business Corporation Law dealing with dissenting shareholders. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:50 pm by Ron Coleman
But given that low baseline standard, Pillsbury has just been Pillsbury, as its shareholders expect it to be. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 2:30 pm by Robert Kreisman
Court of Appeals Finds that Claims of an Individual Shareholder are Derivative to the Corporation U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
Throw into the litigation mix the specter of under-reported taxes and it becomes positively toxic, which is the flavor I got from reading Justice Demarest’s detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law in her 24-page ruling which, ultimately, found that the controlling shareholders skimmed about $3.7 million and conditionally ordered dissolution of the corporation, contingent upon the controllers’ buy-out of the… [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:53 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
" His litigation journey (in several states, civil and criminal) is nothing short of remarkable. [read post]