Search for: "In re Appeal of Eagle" Results 121 - 140 of 295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 3:25 am by NCC Staff
Despite being outcast from the Whigs and the Democrats, Tyler sought re-election in 1844 against overwhelming odds. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 8:48 am
There are still plenty of law firms that have not totally caught on and think if they pay a salary to employees, they're exempt. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
Third Circuit: There's a fine line between clever and stupid; you're on the wrong side. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Orsburn, No. 07-2584, 07-2585 Convictions for mail fraud are affirmed, but the sentences vacated and the case remanded for re-sentencing where the trial court applied the wrong Guidelines sentence when it concluded that embezzling money from the government fell under section 2C1.1 of the Guidelines which covers frauds that incl [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
Never too late 16  [week ending Sunday 19 October] -- The Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Nampak Plastics Europe Ltd v Alpla UK Ltd | Former Eagle member claims infringement of his name in the US | The Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Specsavers v Asda | A change in format for the European Patent Attorney exam | Reflections over IP5 patent filing figures |  ‘Common Sense For… [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
In this post, Jeremy allows occasional guest blogger Paul England (Taylor Wessing LLP) to report on the appeal decision of this case, rendered by the Court of Appeal for England and Wales.* Is This Henley a Shirt or a Musician? [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 4:14 pm
Besides a penchant for legal battles over the use of public money, he owned the Philadelphia Eagles from 1985 to 1994.) [read post]
24 May 2013, 12:46 pm by Venkat
SF Design GroupEx-Employer's Hijacking of a LinkedIn Account Is a Publicity Rights Violation--Eagle v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm by Sheppard Mullin
In 2006, the California Court of Appeal issued the first reported decision interpreting the scope of a beneficiary provision, City of Burbank ex rel. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 12:55 pm by Sonya Hubbard
” Headed to Court: In the annual report that Eagle Materials, Inc. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 1:45 pm
A state Superior Court found in favor of the CA SoS but a Court of Appeal found that the PEMT Requirements did indeed betray characteristics of regulations and should therefore have gone through the regulatory procedure (for the legal eagles out there, see: County of San Diego v. [read post]