Search for: "In re Bartlett" Results 121 - 140 of 393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Leah Malone, Emily Holland, and Chayla Sherrod, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Thursday, November 14, 2024 Editor's Note: Leah Malone is a Partner, Emily Holland is a Counsel, and Chayla Sherrod is an Associate at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Leah Malone, Emily Holland, and Chayla Sherrod, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Thursday, November 14, 2024 Editor's Note: Leah Malone is a Partner, Emily Holland is a Counsel, and Chayla Sherrod is an Associate at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:05 pm by Law Office of Ava George Stewart, P.C.
"The written opinion only restated what we already knew, what I thought to be the case, that it did require a joint decision between the county and the local municipality to either trade roads or give up any roadways," said the Bartlett Republican. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 4:30 am
We’re not saying that the Sullivan case is a complete train-wreck, but it is not exactly pleasant beach reading either. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:53 am
While this new statistic proves a decrease in the number of fatalities from these types of accidents, we're still seeing far too many of these preventable accidents. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
Bartlett produced a couple of decent rulings, and then it produced some monstrous ones, followed by a $21 million verdict. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
  Similarly in In re Fosamax Litigation, 2012 WL 181411 (D.N.J. [read post]
5 May 2011, 12:53 pm
Jeff Bartlett of Consumer Reports says, “The police are using the information not only to determine traffic flows, but reportedly, they’re also using it to set up speed traps. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
  While this “stop selling” or “never sell” theory has been labeled in various ways (including “fraud on the FDA”) to meet the plaintiff’s particular needs, it seems to us like a re-framing of design defect, albeit without pesky requirements like a feasible alternative design, no liability with adequate (or without inadequate) warnings, or proximate cause. [read post]