Search for: "In re Habeas Corpus of Factor"
Results 121 - 140
of 189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am
§ 2254(d) and this Court’s precedent permit federal habeas corpus relief on a claim that a state judge unconstitutionally “coerces” jurors to return a guilty verdict by identifying specific evidence in the case as important and instructing them to consider it? [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:04 pm
LEXIS 8294 (Cal 8/26/2010) In re Richardson, 2010 Cal. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:00 am
Our law firm also represent clients in all types of criminal charges such as appeals, habeas corpus, domestic violence, assault and battery, murder, attempted murder, hit and run, DUI, drug crimes, white collar crimes, embezzlement, fraud, professional licensing defense, abuse, sex crime, appeals and habeas corpus. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
IN RE MATTHE v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm
Martin Docket: 09-996 Issue: Whether, in federal habeas corpus proceedings, a state law under which a prisoner may be barred from collaterally attacking his conviction when the prisoner “substantially delayed” filing his habeas petition is “inadequate” to support a procedural bar because (1) the federal court believes that the rule is vague and (2) the state failed to prove that its courts… [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
§ 1983, or whether such a claim may be asserted only in a petition for writ of habeas corpus. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
In re Bruce Webster, 2010 U.S. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm
LEXIS 8868 (6th Cir. 4/29/2010) (dissent) Examining the power of a district court to enforce a grant of habeas corpus. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
The most significant of these rulings was the al Odah case, in which a panel that included Judge Garland held early in the line of detainee cases that federal district courts lack habeas corpus jurisdiction over the Guantanamo detainees’ claims. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 5:52 pm
Lane, are also a reminder of the value of the lawyer you retain to help get you through any case - not just a death penalty or habeas corpus matter. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:46 am
The Court affirmed the district court’s denial of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 4:26 am
I read somewhere that, since the passage of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act in 1996, the rate of success in Federal habeas corpus cases is less than 1%. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 10:04 pm
Res. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:45 am
 Both then went the route of federal habeas corpus, and that's where their paths diverged: van Hook was granted relief by the 6th Circuit, while Porter was denied relief by the 11th. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 1:50 am
We're not willing to match what they did. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:09 am
As his execution date approached, Davis filed a habeas corpus petition directly with the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals presenting a claim of actual innocence not tied to any other constitutional violation. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
After his initial efforts to seek state post-conviction relief were unsuccessful, Bies filed a petition for habeas corpus in federal court, arguing that because he was mentally retarded, the Eighth Amendment prohibited his execution. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:14 am
After his initial efforts to seek state post-conviction relief were unsuccessful, Bies filed a petition for habeas corpus in federal court, arguing that because he was mentally retarded, the Eighth Amendment prohibited his execution. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:42 pm
Nonetheless, they upheld his death sentence because they found that the mitigating force of the mental retardation was outweighed by the various aggravating factors. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Tomko , No. 05-4997 Sentence for tax evasion is confirmed where: 1) the the district court did not commit procedural error at sentencing, as the record shows the district court did not fail to meaningfully consider the 18 U.S.C. sec. 3553(a) factor of general deterrence; and 2) the court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant, as the court conducted a thorough analysis of the sec. 3553(a) factors and gave logical reasons for the variance from the sentencing guidelines… [read post]
