Search for: "In re INITIATIVE STATE QUESTION NO. 10." Results 121 - 140 of 4,196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2015, 1:19 am by Steve Baird
Federal copyright law is preemptive and as a result States cannot seek to protect copyright under State law. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
 The trial court initially stated that this latter question was outside of its jurisdiction but seems to have reversed course. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 8:18 am
That question, and the controversy surrounding it, continues to dog Gov. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Sean Hanover
We practicein both state and federal courts in VA, MD, and DC. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 6:47 am by Jonathan Tycko
  At Tycko & Zavareei LLP, we offer free initial consultations, and can answer your questions about how qui tam statutes work. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:07 am by CAPTAIN
  And I'm certainly no Shakespeare; but that is the question of the day. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:49 pm by Tomassi Law Associates
 After initial meetings with you, your lawyer will investigate your claim. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:46 am by Kalvis Golde
Once King’s case proceeded to trial, initial questioning of potential jurors by both the prosecution and defense whittled down the pool to 42 candidates, eight of whom were Black. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 10:10 am
  And while the owner of the initial marks was the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), a public agency jointly run by the States of New York and New Jersey, the marks were transferred in 1986, for a mere $10 according to this NorthJersey.com article, to a not-for-profit organization called (appropriately) World Trade Centers Association (WTCA), run by Guy Tozzoli, a former executive of PANYNJ. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 7:01 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Alison Nathan this week in Agence France Presse v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 7:29 pm
The initial trial was declared a mistrial since certain jurors didn't show up for court. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:23 pm
That is a question myself and other criminal defense lawyers have repeatedly asked in almost every case where the issue arises. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Facts submitted only with the statement of grounds of appeal are even less able to remedy a lack of substantiation of the initial request for re-establishment of rights (J 18/98 [4, 7]) [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:07 am by Gritsforbreakfast
But a budget analysis predicts it will save Texas nearly $10 million over the next two years.Two points: First, the state doesn't "save" money under this plan, it just generates more revenue from taxing inmate families by seizing money from commissary accounts. [read post]