Search for: "In re J. J."
Results 121 - 140
of 17,408
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2011, 5:08 am
FRANK J. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:12 am
J. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
These facts clearly do not fulfil the requirements of R 136(2), in that they were not presented in the request for re-establishment of rights. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:09 am
"They're not my arguments. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
In addition to this, it argued that in view of the Notice from the EPO dated 2 November 2009 concerning the re-introduction of a grace period for the payment of extension fees (OJ EPO 2009, 603), applicable to applications for which the basic time limit for payment of designation fees expires on or after 1 January 2010, the EPO’s refusal to accept the [applicant’s] payment of the extension fees led to an inequitable situation. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm
District of Columbia, J. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 3:35 pm
Corbett and Robert J. [read post]
15 May 2020, 12:05 am
Jinyan Li, Arjin Choi & Cameron Smith (Osgoode Hall), Automation and Workers: Re-Imagining the Income Tax for the Digital Age, 68 Canadian Tax J. 99 (2020): In the age of automation, more and more workers lose jobs or become gig workers, and the share of labour income in national income... [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 2:00 pm
Alec J. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
Ilyse Wolens Schuman Michael J. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 12:00 am
Jörg Kammerhofer (University of Freiburg - Faculty of Law) has posted Beyond the Res Iudicata Doctrine: The Nomomechanics of ICJ Interpretation Judgments on SSRN. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:48 am
FRANK J. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The same is true where, as in the present case, the description referred to Figures 1 to 11, but no Figure 11 was filed: Figure 11 was clearly missing (see also J 15/12). [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:09 am
” The Board also noted it decision in In re P.J. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 12:01 am
Although the subtitle of Lawrence J. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
This is in line with decisions T 842/90 and J 20/00 where it was considered possible that the payment of an additional fee amounting to [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
Hence, the applicant cannot derive any claims if this communication is either not sent (see J 12/84) or not sent to the correct addressee. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:35 pm
If you're thinking of submitting a manuscript for publication in Legal Communication & Rhetoric: JALWD, mark your calendar for the September 15th deadline. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:52 am
We're proud to share this good news with you. [read post]
29 May 2012, 11:18 pm
Taylor and Michael J. [read post]
