Search for: "In re Joiner" Results 121 - 139 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2009, 3:47 pm
The biggest, sure, indispensable, even, if you want to play the flatterer, but that’s neither here nor there – hey, we’re just another player in the game, everybody, even if we’re big or even the biggest, hey, we’re just another player. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 2:41 pm
The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America withdrew more than half of its pay-for-performance proposals after negotiations with companies. [read post]
3 May 2008, 3:56 pm
A message from mediator and annual cyberweek hero, John DeBruyn of Denver, about yesterday's ABA post, was sitting in my email this morning;"...Having presided over the decline and fall of a once very active email lawyer discussion group Network-Lawyers, I have a theory.... which leads me to pin the decline and fall of many great online email and web based discussion groups, like Dispute-Res for example, on the advent of Google and the rise of blogs ....I am going to read this… [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
"We're very pleased that so many of our members--both public [pension funds] and unions--have stepped up to the plate and signed on to these letters," Borrus told Risk & Governance Weekly. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
According to RiskMetrics Group records, the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America alone has so far filed nearly 60 such resolutions, with the vast majority targeting S&P 500 companies. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 9:41 am
Joiner, a Republican, wrote: "It is the re-sentencing of Presley to a non-death sentence that makes Gamble's sentence of death constitutionally unfair. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 3:56 am
If you're a joiner, you might benefit from making those contacts.It is, however, important to be involved in the local criminal defense bar. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
We're also quite pleased with the exclusion of this sort of second-guessing. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:38 am
The question can be the more strongly put forth Because it is usually quite different with the U.S Supreme Court.There the practice is usually to identifyAuthor, joiner, concurrer and dissenterFrom liberals like Douglas to reactionaries like Willis Van Devanter,Or, in more modern days, Breyer or Ginsberg on the one hand,Or Scalia, Thomas or others from the right wing band.So why is it so different in the courts of appeal,Where you'd never know who's a hero, who's a heel? [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 6:32 pm
If you're still reading (I know that was about as exciting as a root canal) here is the Z-list. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:22 am
-- Senators), a supporter of a compromise that allowed reactionary judges to be confirmed, a shill for the insurance industry, victorious in the election extensively because of Republican votes, a self admitted potential joiner of the Republican Party, and a long time supporter of the war (there was even talk at one point of Bush appointing him to replace Rumsfeld), Lieberman now holds the key to Democratic control of the Senate. [read post]