Search for: "In re Mark C. (1992)"
Results 121 - 140
of 214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
§ 4980H(c)(7), 2 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Lee, 505 U.S. 672 (1992) (concluding that an airport is indeed a nonpublic forum); Children of the Rosary v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
Notes for C. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
Montex was not attempting to re-litigate. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) I have been posting about the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law." [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:25 am
& C.4th 212, 216 (Pa. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:25 pm
at *6-7.Legislative History of Unintentional Delays“Before 1992, §41(c) required the petitioner to show that the late payment was “unavoidable,” and the pre-1992 regulation, 37 C.F.R. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Thus, in In re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, 489 F. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm
What if you listed three boxes without a check mark? [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
C. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 10:39 am
It is a matter of the substantive legal monopoly scope of trade mark registrations, most relevant in inter partes trade mark conflicts. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
Oracle's motion is moot. 23 C. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
., In re Synchronoss Sec. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:58 am
Surely they’re costing him a fortune. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 12:03 am
We can now add evidence from the Leveson enquiry to our view of the press as a policing agency, of the police as an agency too often in bed with the media or chasing celebrity figures for dubious purposes (see Dominic Lawson on this), and of politics as not so much the art of the possible as a contract with the public, press and police as to what can be said without damaging re-electability. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
According to […] D4 (filed on December 28, 1992) the MN value of “Ultravis 10” is within the same domain, but its methylvinylidene content is of “about 76%”. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
Kerr: You’re up. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:46 pm
The government leaves it to the market forces to decide which press products survive’(1992: 53). [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
I quote below the body of the argument in the brief, minus the footnotes; but if you’re interested in the issue, you might just want to read the PDF. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm
§ 1125(c), if it can prove that the mark is “famous. [read post]
