Search for: "In re Marriage of Stevens"
Results 121 - 140
of 275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2015, 3:32 am
Photo: David Ball Huckabee has made the call several times after the current Court ruled on significant cases involving Obamacare and same-sex marriages recently. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
It is hard to imagine a similar re-imagination of Obergefell as a decision that thwarts rather than serves gay liberation. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:44 pm
We’re not yet done with Glossip v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Hodges, in which the Court struck down state bans on same-sex marriage and the recognition thereof. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Is that then res judicata with respect to the other? [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
Eastman, the chairman of the board of the National Organization for Marriage, a group in favor of traditional marriage, is in the Courtroom, we’re told. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 4:02 pm
An intelligence report dated 26th September 1999 damningly states: While in the company of Rees, ‘Maz’ was with a plain clothes officer aged about 45 – officer was selling a story to Maz about inter-race marriage and the payment in dowry in the form of livestock The ‘Rees’ mentioned in the intelligence report is private investigator Jonathan Rees from Southern Investigations. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 12:38 pm
The Lawyer Bubble: A Profession in Crisis by Steven J. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
” In the National Journal, Sam Baker looks at what might happen if the Court were to uphold the state bans on same-sex marriage and observes that such a ruling “would open up a new front in one of the most polarizing culture wars of the last 20 years. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re discusses last week’s denial of review in the gun rights case Jackson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:56 am
Supreme Court to let them re-bury his remains on Indian land in his native Oklahoma. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm
Jones “effects” test for personal jurisdiction [David Post] “We’re Not in Kansas: No General Jurisdiction After Bauman” [Steven Boranian, Drug and Device Law] Noah Feldman, for one, isn’t buying Toobin’s latest sanctimonious swipe at Scalia [Bloomberg View] Usage of commas in famous first line of Pride and Prejudice can shed light on how to read Constitutional guarantee of right to keep and bear arms [Eugene Volokh] Tags:… [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 3:36 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at a proposal by retired Justice John Paul Stevens for a constitutional amendment addressing state sovereign immunity; Re contends that “thereis something quite surprising about Stevens’s proposal: if read according to its terms, it might not have any significant effect at all. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 3:49 am
” In The National Law Journal (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports on an amicus brief supporting the challengers to state bans on same-sex marriage that garnered a “record number” of signers. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie recaps Wednesday’s oral arguments in EEOC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re continues his discussion of signaling at the Court, noting that “the idea of a ‘signal’ . . . became quite salient, as Justice Thomas expressly referred to signals in criticizing the Court’s latest same-sex marriage order. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:36 am
” At Big Think, Steven Mazie considers whether, if the Court were to strike down state bans on same-sex marriage, a state court judge could ignore that decision. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm
Below are items of potential interest to LHB readers: The Center for the Study of Law and Society (credit)Monday, February 9 - Kaaryn GustafsonProfessor of Law, UC Irvine Law School "The Legal Manufacturing of Hardworking Bastards: Marriage, Bastardy, Apprenticeship, and the Policing of Race and Labor in North Carolina, 1741-1870"Monday, March 9 - Steven WilfProfessor of Law, University of Connecticut School of Law "(Re)-Contextualizing… [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
Then the movement became bipartisan, as Congress tried to re-enact a broad presumptive exemption regime with RFRA and RLUIPA. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
If you're interested, flip to the next page to see the juicy indictment. [read post]
