Search for: "In re Michael B"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,355
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
E199 (2010). [2] Notice of retraction for Teng Zeng & William Mitch, “Oral intake of ranitidine increases urinary excretion of N-nitrosodimethylamine,” 37 Carcinogenesis 625 (2016), published online (May 4, 2021) (retraction requested by authors with an acknowledgement that they had used incorrect analytical methods for their study). [3] Tianwei He, “Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010,” 96 Scientometrics 555 (2013); Bhumika Bhatt, “A… [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:05 am
Tara B. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:05 am
Tara B. [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:06 am
Michael Wandsworth Common [2023] ECC Swk 2] [Top of section] [Top of post] Exhumation Errors in burial Re Bloxwich Cemetery [2023] ECC Lic 1 When the petitioner’s uncle was interred in 1969, the intention was that the grave would accommodate three coffins in a single family grave. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:53 am
Michael Bommarito 2:06 Yes, sir. [read post]
27 May 2023, 5:50 pm
Pix Credit here Indonesian Cave Painting dated to 43,900 years agoToday, following the Council’s recommendation, Norges Bank announced its decision to place PT Semen Indonesia (Persero) Tbk (SIG) under observation pursuant to the ethical guidelines’ criterion concerning “other particularly serious violations of fundamental ethical norms”. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:19 am
You have no idea how close we are to Michael standing up. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Bragg: “In order to get Michael Cohen his money back, they planned one last false statement. [read post]
23 May 2023, 6:07 am
Murphy told Ambassador Tai that “negotiators are usually very, very tough and sometimes mean people; they’re not nice people like you are. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
Michael Geist The Lean Law FirmE182: Want a more relaxing vacation? [read post]
20 May 2023, 11:40 pm
The issue of “embodied carbon” arose again this week in Re St Michael Wandsworth Common [2023] ECC Swk 2 in which the DAC commented [emphasis added]: “[19]. [read post]
18 May 2023, 10:41 am
Some of the best were when I read a New York Times op-ed by a law professor named Michael McConnell this past Sunday, in which he repeated almost verbatim some weak arguments that he had made in 2012. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:30 pm
This post, by Karen Tani (University of Pennsylvania), is the fifth in a series of posts in which legal historians reflect on Outside In: The Oral History of Guido Calabresi (Oxford University Press), by Norman I. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Desperate times demand desperate measures. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Buchanan and Michael C. [read post]
14 May 2023, 2:31 pm
Code § 3101(b). [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:52 am
Michael Cumnor at paragraphs 12 to 14″. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The debt ceiling statute is a bad idea, but it was not sloppily drafted.In its current form, the debt ceiling statute (31 USC § 3101: Public debt limit) in subsection (b) puts an aggregate limit on “[t]he face amount of obligations issued under this chapter and the face amount of obligations whose principal and interest are guaranteed by the United States Government. [read post]
5 May 2023, 3:39 am
Lipman Brewing Company, LLC, Serial No. 88209633 (May 3, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:58 pm
And we’re happy to have the opportunity to be very, very clear about our view of the legal landscape. [read post]
