Search for: "In re Mullen" Results 121 - 140 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2008, 3:00 am
That this law may be a direct encroachment on fundamental human rights and principles of justice has been discussed elsewhere (Sullivan, Mullen, & Pathe, 2005). (1) These ethical, moral and political arguments aside, the specific nature of the Victorian Serious Sex Offender Monitoring Act leads to considerable debate about its appropriateness and creates a number of issues on public policy, theoretical, practical and clinical levels. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 pm
Tessera designs semiconductors, and thereby manufactures patent litigations. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by JB
“We're at the point where there would have to be some, you know, some serious disruptions in order not to raise [the debt ceiling],” he said. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:39 pm by David Lat
Williams Mullen (aka the “cucumber incident”), or maybe Braude v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 6:59 am
 [18]  Teams have recently had to make conscious decisions to pay a Stafford-like salary to a first round pick, trade down in the draft to reduce salary demands for draft picks, or re-sign important and proven veterans. [19]  Unfortunately, it seems like the trend is to get rid of valuable or roster filling veterans to bring in the glamour of a first round draft pick. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In a recent ruling, In re Madelyn B., the Supreme Court of New Hampshire said yes, under a state statute that grants parental status to a person who has held out a child as her own. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Supreme Court of Ohio, for example, in In re Mullen (2011) held that a “parent may voluntarily share with a nonparent the care, custody, and control of his or her child through a valid shared-parenting agreement,” the crux of which “is the purposeful relinquishment of some portion of the parent’s right to exclusive custody of the child. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
There is no question that the Supreme Court’s June 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Sonnenschein Blog-Tolerant This one was listed on the Practice Group page, but not very easily discoverable if you don't know exactly what you're looking for. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
" The reference to Salford v Mullen is a reference to the cases considered in the current judgment of the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
" The reference to Salford v Mullen is a reference to the cases considered in the current judgment of the Supreme Court. [read post]