Search for: "In re R.C." Results 121 - 140 of 300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am by MBettman
”) In re Kemmler, 136 U.S. 436 (1890) (punishments are cruel “when they involve torture or a lingering death. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:25 am by MBettman
The Fifth District Court of Appeals reversed as to both, finding that a violation of departmental policy or traffic laws may be a factor in determining whether a political subdivision employee is entitled to immunity under R.C. 2744. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:05 am by MBettman
In July of 2010, a statewide labor union, the Ohio Democratic Party, and several Democratic candidates for election or re-election to judgeships filed a lawsuit in Federal District Court in Cincinnati alleging that R.C. 3505.04 violated their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights to freedom of expression and association. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:34 am by MBettman
On February 16, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in In re Messer, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-510. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:41 am by MBettman
”) In Re Dorsey, 13, 8036 (B.A.P. 6th Cir. 2014) (Evaluating Kentucky law, holding that “a mortgage is valid and enforceable only if the underlying debt continues to be an enforceable obligation. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 6:12 am by MBettman
At issue in the case is whether R.C. 2305.23, Ohio’s Good Samaritan statute, provides immunity to a lay person attempting to provide emergency assistance to an injured party at the scene of an accident. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:08 am by MBettman
Key Statutes R.C. 2307.76 (Product defective due to inadequate warning or instruction.) [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:48 am by MBettman
Juvenile adjudications will never have long term consequences provided that the juvenile does not re-offend. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 1:03 pm by MBettman
Dep’t of Natural Res., 62 Ohio St. 2d 138 (1980)( The purpose of the immunity is “to encourage owners of premises suitable for recreational pursuits to open their land to public use without worrying about liability. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:11 am by MBettman
”) R.C. 2929.13 (F)(6) (A first- or second-degree felony sentence must be mandatory if the defendant had a prior conviction for another first- or second degree felony, or any other equivalent offense) Apprendi v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 6:14 am by MBettman
This court has held in In Re CS that when a child waives his right to counsel, there has to be a demonstration of understanding. [read post]