Search for: "In re Rebecca C."
Results 121 - 140
of 289
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2017, 9:08 am
Still get broader scope in TM no matter what b/c of infringement standard. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 9:14 am
Or is the first step to think about contract and tort b/c all new problems are old.Stewart: depends on the type of problem you’re dealing with. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
You’re just updating for new tech, but these techs existed 100 years ago. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
In honor of International Women's Day, a list of some films that feature female lawyers and judges.A la folie, pas du tout (2002). [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
In honor of International Women's Day, a list of some films that feature female lawyers and judges.A la folie, pas du tout (2002). [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law Symposium Sorry, guys, I did not follow the patent panels.Panel III: Trademarks Rebecca Tushnet, Fixing Incontestability: The Next FrontierIncontestability is a nearly unique feature of American trademark law, with a unique American implementation. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am
Administrative Law Judge Ritchie made some compelling points on Tam’s re-appropriation argument as well. [read post]
University Rejection of Students’ Marijuana-Themed T-Shirt Violates First Amendment–Gerlich v. Leath
15 Feb 2017, 8:16 am
The initial complaint, along with Exhibits B and C. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:08 am
Rebecca Tushnet, Georgetown University (representing Law Professors on amicus brief)TM is a right to suppress speech. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:13 am
There is no need to re-open the copyright TPM provisions. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Rebecca Tushnet, Fair Use HopefulnessI’m here to praise Professor Jaszi’s work making fair use useful: empowering communities and individuals to rely on fair use, rather than leaving it, as Larry Lessig famously said, merely the right to hire a lawyer. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:11 am
You can listen to our 19-minute interview here: Or find a transcript of our conversation below the jump.Interview with Rebecca Bernhardt, executive director, Texas Fair Defense Project. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
” The letter called for a completely independent re-analysis of the PACE trial data, since the authors have refused to publish the results they outlined in their original protocol. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm
Lemley: innovation often goes along w/having to take a license b/c of patent threats. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:53 am
Perhaps this analysis may add further support to Professor Rebecca Tushnet’s forthcoming Essay (not that she needs it), contending “that In re Tam is wrongly reasoned even given the Supreme Court’s increased scrutiny of commercial speech regulations, and that to hold otherwise and preserve the rest of trademark law would require unprincipled distinctions within trademark law. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 2:55 pm
His now famous phrase, about a game (or a season) not being over until it’s over has become the archetype for a thought which is a) true, b) egregiously obvious and c) useless. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 9:00 pm
(We’re sassy.) [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Looking for Ashley: What Re-Reading What the Smith Case Reveals About Governance of Girls, Mothers and Families in Canada © 2015 Demeter Press. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
Two class actions allege that profiles are commercial speech violating attys’ publicity rights, b/c we’re monetizing w/advertising. [read post]
20 May 2016, 12:25 pm
RT: same move is made in In re Tam: §2(a) disparagement is subject to strict scrutiny b/c it’s not commercial speech, but the deception bars in §2 are totally ok because Central Hudson. [read post]
