Search for: "In re Rowles"
Results 121 - 140
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2013, 11:32 am
When J K Rowling launched Pottermore, she famously released the Harry Potter books without any copy protection, but with watermarking embedded in them. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
(TTABlog) TTAB precedential no. 50: TTAB says consent and license from registrant require reversal of 2(d) refusal of WACKER NEUSON over NEUSON for Machinery – In re Wacker Neuson SE (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no. 1: TTAB affirms 2(e)(5) functionality refusal of motorcycle stand design: In re Charles N. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
Is it kind to exercise “discretion” and not say anything that challenges the orthodoxy such that the zealots believe they are the majority, even though they’re not. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Rowling was the true author of the thriller The Cuckoo’s Calling. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 3:46 am
Rowling didn’t write Harry Potter to look like him. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
Rowling, you're basically buying the author a drink. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:39 am
And so we’re back to burning books. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Whether it’s against Chard Harbach, JK Rowling or Emma Cline, the lifespan of these claims tend to be pretty short. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:12 am
So you're their owner.But does that mean you own the copyright subsisting in those products? [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am
They didn’t want to pay market royalties to the publishers in Google books, and they’re trying to expand fair use around the world. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:56 pm
That's hardly the stuff of Tolkien, Larsson, or Rowling. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:10 pm
Sorry, but you’re way off. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:12 am
Rowling's latest trick: the mysterious website Pottermore" http://j.mp/kjObSX "The Mess We're In: Reviewing the New York Times Review of the Documentary About the Times" http://j.mp/kQMalV are you sad to see the end of peter everett? [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:32 am
Rowling. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:59 am
Rowling's movie franchise" http://j.mp/qnfGiI The Black Times is out! [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
They perform well b/c they’re good at doing the task. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
Baroness Hale and others of course rejected such a notion obiter in Campbell and the High Court in the JK Rowling (Murray v Express Newspapers) case struck out JK Rowling’s claim on behalf of her young son after she was photographed in the street in Edinburgh, pushing him in his pram. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
The Sun has defended its decision to track down JK Rowling’s ex-husband whom she accused of domestic abuse for the first time in a blog post. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:48 pm
Rowling 2. [read post]
