Search for: "In re Scott (1991)" Results 121 - 140 of 142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2008, 10:16 am
If they're guilty, the failure to record what happened in that interrogation room back in 1999 will most likely be the reason the state can't convict them. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Today we're going to speculate a bit about what might happen if we win. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 12:22 pm
She checked the Web, then walked to the apartment "because of the way our generation is; we sort of feel we're a part of each other's lives. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 4:24 am
Ex parte Arthur, 711 So. 2d 1097 (Ala. 1997) Arthur's application for re-hearing was denied 1998. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:47 pm
Schwab Case No. 05-1991-CF-7249-AXXX acquittal on retrial.' Scott, 604 So.2d at 468 (quoting Jones v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:47 pm
Schwab Case No. 05-1991-CF-7249-AXXX acquittal on retrial.' Scott, 604 So.2d at 468 (quoting Jones v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:18 pm
The authors do not distinguish between sexual and violent offences in this study, but in a more recently published analysis by the same group involving 191 of the child molesters, 35% were reconvicted of a sexual offence in the same follow-up period (Hanson, Scott & Steffy, 1995). [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
Fogcutter Bar, 813 P.2d 660, 663-664 (Alaska 1991); Adkinson v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Supp. 417, 425-26 (D.D.C. 1991). [read post]