Search for: "In re Shaw" Results 121 - 140 of 968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 5:17 am by Brandon W. Barnett
 I know a lot of the tardy attorneys I see think they're exuding confidence. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:31 am by Terrye Conroy
After huge budget cuts across state government, the program came to a halt; but, thanks to the generosity of an anonymous donor, we’re on the road again with 11 locations scheduled! [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Corp. v Shaw ; 2010 NY Slip Op 00087 Decided on January 5, 2010; Appellate Division, Second Department; Chambers, J., J. the court writes persuasively about the concept:   "In bankruptcy proceedings, the general rule arising under 11 USC § 330(a)(4) is that "a finding of malpractice would mean that the attorneys were not entitled to compensation for those services found to be substandard" and, accordingly, failure to raise the malpractice claims when the final fee… [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Corp. v Shaw ;  2010 NY Slip Op 00087 Decided on January 5, 2010; Appellate Division, Second Department; Chambers, J., J. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:56 pm
The Supreme Court is considering even more briefing in the Brinker case re meal and rest periods. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:07 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLP By Nick Geannacopulos and Emily Barker You have likely noticed that business interactions and the way people communicate professionally have declined in formality over recent years. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:01 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Though we’re a couple days out from the decision we’re still seeing a posts coming in on the D.C. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:53 am
In re Mighty Buildings, Inc., Serial Nos. 90384068, 90384173, 90384232 and 903842721 (June 30, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw) [Refusal to register the marks MIGHTY STUDIO, MIGHTY DUPLEX, MIGHTY HOUSE and MIGHTY DUO for "3D printing of building components and structures for others" and for "Custom 3D printing of residential buildings [for others]" (STUDIO, DUPLEX, and HOUSE disclaimed), in view of the registered mark MIGHTY SMALL HOMES… [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 5:05 am
In re ISCA Technologies, Inc., Serial No. 87321402 (April 24, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw).The Board took only six pages to affirm the refusal. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:17 am
I think we're finally going to find out what the law is on meal periods in California. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:31 pm by Kalvis Golde
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
The question of copyright in dance has recently been at the center of attention for the so-called "Fortnite saga" (see Kat Mathilde's, Kat friend John William Shaw and Kat friend Charlotte Waelde posts on this topic here, here and here).Delving into the history of IP litigation in the US we find the case Fuller v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 10:48 am by Dennis Crouch
  The patent challenger had already won on all-but-one claim before the PTAB, and re-institution might have required a new trial on all of the challenged claims. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Robert B. Milligan
Throughout 2015, Seyfarth Shaw’s dedicated Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes Practice Group hosted a series of CLE webinars that addressed significant issues facing clients today in this important and ever-changing area of law. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 2:52 pm by William D. Kickham, Esq.
As everyone knows, self-serve checkout stations at supermarkets continues to grow exponentially, even at retail store outlets that aren’t purely supermarkets like Stop & Shop, Star Markets or Shaw’s. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:15 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
(That was when Marty McFly first introduced the “hover board”; you’re so late to the party, Tony Hawk.) [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 1:02 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Notably, for the China Agritech case, the Supreme Court might re-shape the landmark 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction v. [read post]