Search for: "In re the Interest of J. R."
Results 121 - 140
of 2,803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2009, 5:46 pm
Edward J. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 12:50 pm
James J. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:33 pm
Just to review “equitable estoppel” is a finding by a court, if the court finds the criteria met and the best interests of the child(ren) require the finding, that a person is the father or parent of a child when because they have held themselves out as the father. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:18 am
Jul. 7, 2011) (Zagel, J.). [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 10:13 am
According to the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, police arrested Mario Chavez, Robin Nelson Campanioni, Jorge J. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
The case law also makes clear that a party must move promptly to object to an expert witness’s conflict of interest.[7] Not the same product, but similar product, in a later case When the expert witness in question testified for an adversary in a different case, the analysis of confidential aspect of the shared information becomes more difficult. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 12:17 pm
Its June 13, 2013 decision in In re Antoinette McK affirmed the order of New York County Family Court Judge Rhoda J. [read post]
23 May 2020, 7:03 am
You're wondering about "blurt. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 12:23 pm
I just attended an enjoyable and informative talk by friend and neighbor J. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:00 am
Le père biologique peut réclamer une filiation, bien que l’acte d’état désigne déjà 2 autres personnes du même sexe, et ce, même si ces dernières ont une possession d’état. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 11:50 am
Holly J. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:30 am
R. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
For the third installment, we turn to law professor Mary J. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 2:24 pm
I thought I’d pass along this very interesting article by Judge Andrew J. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
PÉNAL (DROIT) : Le juge de première instance s’est inspiré à bon droit de l’arrêt R. c. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 12:30 am
An interesting aspect of the decision is the consideration given by the BA to the legal justification for the COVID-19 extension. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
R., 2018 QCCA 1181Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), Montréal, 500-10-005985-153Décision de : Juges Jean Bouchard, Jacques J. [read post]
