Search for: "In the Interest of: R.C." Results 121 - 140 of 395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2019, 6:22 am by MBettman
The interests of an individual and his privacy rights must be balanced against the officers’ interest in securing their safety and the safety of the public. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:46 am by MBettman
The best way to make the necessary determination here is not just to look at a zero support order, but rather to look at all the facts and circumstances and then have the probate court determine what is in the best interest of the child. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by MBettman
Cincinnati, 30 Ohio St.3d 28 (1987) (The Supreme Court of Ohio may resolve a matter, even if it is moot with respect to the parties, if the instant matter is of great public interest). [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:55 pm by Sarah Grant
Defense counsel have since argued that Spath’s undisclosed negotiation of this position was a conflict of interest that should have disqualified him from overseeing Al-Nashiri, a claim currently before the U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am by MBettman
  But R.C. 2923.13, the weapons-under-disability statute, provides a number of different disability conditions, a juvenile adjudication being one, and R.C. 2923.13(A)(2), the juvenile adjudication provision, does not use juvenile adjudications as sentence enhancements. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am by MBettman
Key Precedent Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution (“No person shall… be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself…”)  Article I Section 10, of the Ohio Constitution (“No person shall be compelled, in any criminal case, to be a witness against himself” R.C. 2935.01(B) (Statute defining a “Peace Officer”) R.C. 2917.31(A)(1) (Inducing Panic) R.C.… [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:31 am by Eugene Volokh
"Prurient" interest is not the same as a candid, normal, or healthy interest in sex, rather it is a "'shameful or morbid interest in nudity, sex, or excretion [which] goes substantially beyond customary limits of candor in description or representation of such matters.'" Furthermore, as noted previously, this court has accepted a definition of prurient as "an appeal to an unhealthy, abnormal, unwholesome, degrading, shameful, or morbid… [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:11 am by MBettman
The matter is also capable of repetition, yet evading review, and of great public importance and interest, and thus not moot, as precedent sets forth in State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
We're asking the Ohio Supreme Court to review the decision upholding it.A few weeks ago, Patrick Kabat (Chandra Law), Carolyn Allen, and I filed an appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court, asking it to agree to review a very interesting -- and, in my view, troubling -- Ohio Court of Appeals decision. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am by MBettman
Her autonomy to represent her own interests as she sees fit should prevail because she was never determined to be incompetent. [read post]