Search for: "In the Interest of: S.W. Appeal of: S.W."
Results 121 - 140
of 871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2019, 12:31 pm
Citibank (S.D.), N.A., 293 S.W.3d 759, 764 (Tex. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
, 945 S.W.2d 812, 818 (Tex. 1997). [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 8:14 am
Id.Standing is a party's justiciable interest in a controversy. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:35 am
The court of appeals in San Antonio affirmed. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Ass'n, 858 S.W.2d 33, 36 (Tex. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:01 am
But the Court of Appeal reversed. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 8:00 am
Ivy, 878 S.W. 2d at 446 (citing Crothers, 745 S.W. 2d at 172). [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:26 am
Adams, 560 S.W.3d 105 (Tex. 2018). [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 10:42 am
The Sebastians then filed an appeal with Texas’ Ninth District Court of Appeals. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 7:34 pm
Horton, 965 S.W.2d 78, 85 (Tex. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Here's the meat of our argument: [* * *] This Case Is of Great General Interest and Involves a Substantial Constitutional Question [1.] [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
The Court of Appeals specifically found that “the case involved non-professional transportation services and presented no significant public interest considerations. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:40 am
Jordan, 342 S.W.3d 565, 568 (Tex. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:16 am
The 2017 Bray case opened the door for this type of analysis, and it will be interesting to see how the concept of lack of prejudice continues to develop. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 9:10 am
See Dodeka, 377 S.W.3d at 731. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
This appeal ensued. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
PROSAIC PEDESTRIAN PROSE & JUDGE POSNERDiscover Bank's motion to strike pro bono amicus brief Appealing from summary judgment against him, Discover Bank credit card judgment debtor filed tale-of-woe brief in all-Republican state Court of Appeals in Dallas (the Other Fifth Court of Appeals) and had it duly found fault with for formal deficiencies.Pro Se litigants cannot, after all, be treated differently. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:51 pm
Bray, 499 S.W.3d 96, 108-09 (Texas Ct. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 9:41 am
State, 709 S.W.2d 194 (Tex. [read post]
