Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 121 - 140 of 5,876
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1]  [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
" Regardless of how the Court rules on Petitioner's case, the argument that Respondent advances about the Speaker and Senate President Pro Tempore must be rejected. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
If the court rules in Jarkesy’s favor on his Seventh Amendment claim, the SEC may be required to bring certain civil penalty actions for securities violations in federal court. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 2:06 am by David Pocklington
Earlier posts, here and here, have considered various aspects of “sufficient interest” in faculty proceedings under S10(1) and S10(2) Faculty Jurisdiction Rules 2015 (as amended) [1]. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
  Over-regulation of matters historically left to the discretion of directors restricts the flexibility and creative energy that directors bring to a board. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 9:13 am by Rose Hughes
The board shall inform the requesting court or authority, as well as the parties, of its decision, which may include the date of oral proceedings if foreseen.In other EPO news, amended Articles 13(2), 15(1) and 15(9)(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA) entered into force on 1 January 2024. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:28 am by INFORRM
However, the Court deemed complaints under Article 10 inadmissible. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
    In finding that Wise had complied with his obligations two matters were clarified by the Court of Appeal as matter which were in the public interest:   1) Is the Commissioner obliged to reach a definitive decision on the merits of each and every complaint or does he have a discretion to decide that some other outcome is appropriate? [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by Maria Grazia Porcedda
To preserve the effectiveness of Art 82(1), it is the controller who bears the burden of proving the appropriateness of TOMs in light of the security principle enshrined in Art 5(1)(f) and the rules of general application contained in Arts 24(1) and 32(1) at stake in actions for damages (paras 50-52). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Besides private offerings under section 4(a)(2) and its safe harbor, rule 506(b), there are at least five other categories of exemptions: (1) rule 506(c) under the Securities Act; (2) rule 504 under the Securities Act; (3) Regulation A, including tier 1 and tier 2; (4) Regulation Crowdfunding; and (5) the intrastate exemptions under section 3(a)(11) of the Securities Act and rules 147 and 147A. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
”[3] Nonetheless, the amended rules did not directly prohibit termination or cancellation of Rule 10b5-1 plans. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
Guideline 10 doesn’t merely emphasize a potential concern with labor-market effects. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am by Jacob Fishman
We then analyze the merits of the debate and propose new rule language to resolve the matter. [read post]