Search for: "In the Matter of Confidential Consumer Protection Investigation"
Results 121 - 140
of 477
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2021, 9:43 am
Any such requirements of disclosure tend to chill the right of expressive association (which is protected by the First Amendment): This Court has "long understood as implicit in the right to engage in activities protected by the First Amendment a corresponding right to associate with others. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
” United States Government Accountability Office, Report to Congressional Requestors, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Additional Actions Needed to Support a Fair and Inclusive Workplace, pp. 48-49 (May 2016). [read post]
17 May 2021, 9:04 pm
Hodges, another DOJ Consumer Protection Branch attorney. [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:06 am
Protecting our Nation from malicious cyber actors requires the Federal Government to partner with the private sector. [read post]
10 May 2021, 9:05 pm
Attorney in Virginia to the Consumer Protection Branch at main Justice. [read post]
5 May 2021, 3:49 am
For instance, in Nobles, noted above, the Court concluded that by presenting an investigator as a witness, the party lost the work product privilege relating to matters covered in his testimony. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
Ron Wyden, to better protect American data. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 7:51 am
The ban on social scoring seems a matter of optics, declaring that European values reject systems such as those reportedly under development in China. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:57 am
Customs and Border Protection (CBP). [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:35 am
Bill clients, make a term sheet, and delete confidential materials post-mediation. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 6:37 am
Our DuPage County defamation attorneys defend individuals’ First Amendment and free speech rights to address matters of public concern. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
Regardless of how they are counted, the coronavirus-related securities lawsuits tended to fall into one of three categories: first, the lawsuit filed against companies that experienced coronavirus outbreaks within company facilities (such as cruise ship lines and private prison systems); second, companies that had sought to tout their ability to profit from the coronavirus outbreak (such as vaccine developers, diagnostic testing services, manufacturers of personal protective… [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 12:09 pm
The CPSC recently posted guidance on its website for consumer products related to COVID-19, including personal protective equipment. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 2:22 pm
The insurance adjuster assigned to the claim investigated the matter. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 12218-20 Faulkner v LancsLive, 2 Privacy (2019), 14 Confidential sources (2019), No breach – after investigation. 12103-20 Smith v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), No breach – after investigation. 11902-20 Khan v Birminghammail.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation. 10490-20 Devlin v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019, Breach –… [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
DLA Piper’s Privacy Matters had a post “European Law on Cookies Guide”. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection DLA Piper Privacy Matters had a post “Europe: EDPB issues Recommendations on Supplementary Measures and European Essential Guarantees for surveillance measures following Schrems II”. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 3:00 pm
” The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the First Amendment is less protective of speech on “purely private” matters, compared to speech on public matters. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
The primary basis for the adjournment was a “confidential ground”. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
That same list includes Paul Clement, another former Solicitor General and currently a partner at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, who has argued numerous securities cases before the Court and who recently was appointed amicus curiae to argue in favor of the judgment below in a case regarding the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s single-director structure.With respect to what comes next, both Democrat and Republican leaders have spoken. [read post]
