Search for: "In the Matter of K. H." Results 121 - 140 of 1,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2021, 6:49 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Of relevance to the present matter, the Act provides that reimbursement for medical marijuana costs is not required of “a government medical assistance program or private health insurer. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The correct procedure for dealing with errors of this kind is outlined in EPC Guidelines, H-VI 3 (September 2013), where it is also stated that errors of this kind can be corrected at any time, and the Board sees no reason to disagree. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 1:51 pm by Matthias Weller
On March 30, 2017, the Minister of Justice of the Federal State Hessen, Ms Kühne-Hörmann, organized a conference at which the Justice Initiative was presented. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:33 am by Robert A. Epstein
  For instance, if the payor spouse is required by his employer to contribute $30,000 per year towards his 401(k), should such money be included in that spouse's income in determining support? [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The Board then stated:[4] In summary, the board finds that claim 1 of both requests relates to the technical implementation of excluded matter in the form of game rules. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In the absence of any further convincing argument or evidence, the Board could also not accept the [applicant’s] initial allegation that the skilled person would not know how to construct the capsule with a freely rotatable inner housing within the outer shell H as disclosed in D7 […]. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 6:19 am
Securities Laws Posted by Robert Crea, Anthony Nolan, Eden Rohrer, K&L Gates LLP, on Saturday, July 7, 2018 Tags: Bitcoin, Blockchain, CFTC, Cryptocurrency, ICOs, Jurisdiction, No-action letters, Rule 506, SEC, SEC investigations, Securities regulation SLB 14I: Impact of Board Discussion on 2018 NALs Posted by Arthur H. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
HUSBAND agreed that WIFE was entitled to fifty percent of the future disbursements from his 401(k) plan, but not from his ESOP. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:14 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Dollars (Photo credit: 401(K) 2013) Y is for Year-End Bonus. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
One is therefore faced with a fresh case concerning subject-matter which was not considered before by the ED and which may not have been properly searched. [read post]