Search for: "In the Matter of Pacific & Southern Co." Results 121 - 133 of 133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 1:00 pm
"This is about as good a stretch as I've seen," says Michael Chren, who manages $1.5 billion at Allegiant Asset Management Co. in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and has followed the property-casualty industry for 20 years. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
"This is about as good a stretch as I've seen," says Michael Chren, who manages $1.5 billion at Allegiant Asset Management Co. in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and has followed the property-casualty industry for 20 years. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
"This is about as good a stretch as I've seen," says Michael Chren, who manages $1.5 billion at Allegiant Asset Management Co. in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and has followed the property-casualty industry for 20 years. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 3:00 pm
Southern California Gas Co. (9th Cir. 2000) 219 F.3d 1063, where the overtime premium was determined by interpreting a CBA. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 7:44 am
Southern Pacific Co., 79 Ariz. 253 (1955), the leading case in this area, the Supreme Court of Arizona rejected the argument that defendants now press: [W]e fail to understand why, as a practical matter, an employer will refuse to adopt such rules when by their adoption and enforcement the accident would not occur - at least through fault of the employer's servants. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 9:04 am
The Budd Co. (9-CA-38113; 348 NLRB No. 85) Shelbyville, KY Dec. 6, 2006 *** The Budd Co. (9-CA-38113; 348 NLRB No. 85) Shelbyville, KY Dec. 6, 2006. [read post]