Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: I. S. B., Child."
Results 121 - 140
of 314
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm
I appreciate therefore that refusing to follow such a Full Court authority is not a matter to be enterprised lightly or unadvisedly. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 3:15 pm
Code § 22-3133(b). [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 7:51 am
I'll also address a number of Engel's other points. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:42 am
I don't want free flight. [read post]
15 May 2020, 6:20 am
When evaluating where the balance lies between these two competing rights and interests it is important, to my mind, that judges of the Family Court do not allow ourselves to remain magnetically attracted to the welfare principle (i.e. that the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration). [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Last week, a class action lawsuit entitled Gary B. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:32 am
As a child custody attorney, I stress the importance of mutual respect. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 9:38 am
There is urgency if immediate action is, in the view of the court seised in the State of the child's presence, necessary to preserve the child's welfare. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:15 am
" We clarified that the "state's compelling interest to protect a child in any given case, however, is not triggered unless a court finds that a parent's speech is causing or will cause harm to a child's welfare. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 2:09 pm
So as a matter of judging individual welfare in ability-to-pay terms, if I give a $1M gift to my kids, this is $1M worth of consumption by me andby them. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 8:31 am
”Virginia Code § 20-124.2(B). [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 2:32 pm
Once your custodial matter is heard, how you behaved during the Covid-19 pandemic will matter. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am
(b) On January 27, 2017, to implement this policy, I issued Executive Order 13769 (Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States). [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:48 am
• There is no change to paragraph (b). [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 2:06 pm
Herbert B. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:25 am
They involve ambiguous, indefinite questions about matters such as the quality of a child’s relationship with a parent, the impact of substance abuse, mental health disorders or cognitive impairments on a party’s parenting capacity, or whether a child will be better off living in a new town rather than the town in which the child grew up. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
Our trial courts are vested with broad discretion in child custody matters. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
The wording is cumbersome and worth reminding ourselves of, since it is often inaccurately summarised or paraphrased: ‘A court…is…to presume, unless the contrary is shown, that involvement of that parent in the life of the child concerned will further the child’s welfare’. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:10 am
The trial court commented: I am not so much concerned about exact equality, as I [am about] the children having some sort of continuity of contact with each of the parents and to grow up knowing and being close to their mother and their father…. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:02 am
In each case section 1 of the Children Act 1989, enacted by Parliament, requires the welfare of the child to be paramount; that is more important than anything else. [read post]
