Search for: "Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs" Results 121 - 140 of 496
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2013, 7:00 am by Andrew Trask
The problem with these settlements was not that the plaintiffs lacked the leverage to cut a good deal; indeed, the indirect purchasers in Sullivan and the investors in In re AIG did just fine. [read post]
13 May 2019, 9:53 am by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois Brick, Kavanaugh explained, “established a bright-line rule that authorizes suits by direct purchasers but bars suits by indirect purchasers. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Therefore, the rationale (or a part of it) for including indirect purchasers is eliminated. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:57 am by Dylan Ballard
., (1) the conduct has a “direct, substantial, and reasonably foreseeable effect” on U.S. commerce, and (2) that effect “gives rise to” the plaintiff’s claim. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 4:36 pm by Jeffrey Gross
  While a few of the plaintiffs who have sued the large banks were direct purchasers, many, including the City of Baltimore, did not. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 10:36 am by Jeffrey Gross
  Perhaps overly simplified, defendants in the Libor case read the antitrust “indirect purchaser” doctrine to stand for the proposition that only parties who purchased goods from defendants can bring an antitrust claim, while plaintiffs read Illinois Brick as applying only to markets where there are multiple layers of purchasers, such as distributors, wholesalers, and retailers. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 4:41 pm
  In addition, plaintiffs must specify which particular claims are being alleged by plaintiffs as indirect purchasers rather than direct purchasers.Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:27 pm by Bexis
  IN NO EVENT SHALL SELLER BE LIABLE TO PURCHASER, WHETHER IN CONTRACT OR TORT OR FOR BREACH OF STATUTORY DUTY, FOR ANY INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR SPECIAL DAMAGES INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION CLAIMS FOR INDEMNIFICATION, LOST REVENUES AND PROFITS.Prestige Brands, slip op. at 4. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 3:19 pm by Stephanie Zeppa
May 14, 2009), a direct benefit existed under a purchase agreement where, pursuant to its terms, the plaintiff was to enter into a separate lease agreement with the non-signatory entity. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 1:45 pm
 The Court agreed, finding that the Plaintiffs did not fall within the “general co-conspirator exception” to the common law exclusion of indirect purchasers, and thus could not obtain the relief sought from the dealer defendants. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 1:45 pm
 The Court agreed, finding that the Plaintiffs did not fall within the “general co-conspirator exception” to the common law exclusion of indirect purchasers, and thus could not obtain the relief sought from the dealer defendants. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Direct purchaser plaintiffs (DPPs) alleged that Keurig’s anticompetitive practices caused the DPPs to be overcharged for their purchases of cups or pods used in Keurig’s single-server brewer machines, while indirect purchaser plaintiffs made similar claims.Keurig’s K-Cup Brewer was the first commercially successful Single Serve Brewer. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The Supreme Court also expressed concern that if a direct purchaser were not allowed to sue for overcharges passed on to indirect purchasers, indirect purchasers would lack the incentive to bring an antitrust action. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The Supreme Court also expressed concern that if a direct purchaser were not allowed to sue for overcharges passed on to indirect purchasers, indirect purchasers would lack the incentive to bring an antitrust action. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
The complaint’s only other, indirect reference to dissolution appears in ¶ 2 which includes “§1104a, §1104” in its laundry list of BCL statutes upon which the plaintiff’s claims are based. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 7:52 pm
UtiliCorp United, Inc., 497 U.S. 199 (1990) the First says that they are indirect purchasers, because in car leasers " The lessee does not deal directly with the leasing company until after the lease is executed and the leasing company has paid the purchase price to the dealer. [read post]