Search for: "Interest of S.B."
Results 121 - 140
of 457
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2021, 10:46 am
The legislative session has endedm and Governor Newsom is expected to sign into law S.B. 4 and A.B. 14. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
In so ordering, Judge Kacsmaryk broke with long-standing precedent cautioning judicial deference to the political branches in matters implicating foreign affairs and seemed to subordinate the Executive’s interest in controlling such matters to States’ interests in immigration enforcement. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 8:20 am
” The DOJ stated that their requested relief, either a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, is “necessary to protect the constitutional rights of women in Texas and the sovereign interest of the United States in ensuring that its States respect the terms of the national compact,” as well as “to protect federal agencies, employees, and contractors whose lawful actions S.B. 8 purports to prohibit. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 8:51 am
State of Texas, (WD TX, filed 9/14/2021), contends in part:[T]he Court could enjoin any person who files suit under S.B. 8 from prosecuting his or her claim. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 3:22 am
But this goes to the United States’ interest as movant. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 10:18 pm
When acting in their adjudicatory capacity, judges are disinterested neutrals who lack a personal interest in the outcome of the controversy. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 2:42 pm
Does the United States have an interest to ensure that people can vindicate interests in court? [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 9:39 pm
Even if sovereign immunity is waived, there is no statewide injunction available. ] On September 2, President Biden threatened to sue Texas over S.B. 8. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 10:27 am
To that end, virtually all Texas employers are within the statute’s reach.[1] Second, S.B. 45 expands liability to individuals who act “directly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 12:28 pm
Allowing S.B. 8 to go into effect does not as obviously contradict precedent — or expose the court to backlash. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 9:55 am
The Senate-passed budget, S.B. 105, would reduce the state’s flat individual income tax rate from 5.25 to 3.99 percent by 2026 and phase out the corporate income tax altogether by 2028. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:11 am
Polis’ signature on Wednesday comes after the bipartisan bill, S.B. 21-091, passed the state House and Senate with overwhelming support. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:44 pm
Because the law amounted to a content- and viewpoint-based restriction on speech, Florida was required to show that it had a compelling interest in the restrictions and that it doesn’t burden any more or less speech than is necessary to advance that interest. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
A West Virginia bill (S.B. 551) states that "oral food and fluids shall be provided as tolerated in all instances. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 8:01 am
S.B. 7072, therefore, vests the State of Florida with the pure power of the censor EFF et al amicus brief: Many internet users greatly benefit from moderated platforms. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:23 am
The State has no legitimate interest, much less a compelling one, in bringing about this unprecedented result. [read post]
26 May 2021, 12:02 pm
Wagenaar, M.S.W., Ph.D., affiliated with the Beasley School of Law, Temple University (S.B.), and the Schools of Nursing and Medicine, University of Pennsylvania (E.D.A.) [read post]
26 May 2021, 12:02 pm
Wagenaar, M.S.W., Ph.D., affiliated with the Beasley School of Law, Temple University (S.B.), and the Schools of Nursing and Medicine, University of Pennsylvania (E.D.A.) [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 10:42 am
A review of the impact S.B. 72 has on business entities and civil claims is provided by my colleague and litigation attorney Heath Gelman here. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 10:42 am
A review of the impact S.B. 72 has on business entities and civil claims is provided by my colleague and litigation attorney Heath Gelman here. [read post]
