Search for: "Isaac v. Isaac" Results 121 - 140 of 535
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2011, 12:02 pm by Terry Hart
David Post responds, in his article Why Should We Care What Jefferson Thought about Copyright, to my earlier post on the subject regarding Jefferson’s letter to Isaac McPherson. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:41 am by Wells Bennett
Pohl: the military commission in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:30 am
This point recently came before Judge Birss QC in the (still misnamed) Patents County Court for England and Wales in relation to whether a substantial part of a book was reproduced in a film script: Hodgson and Jarvie v Isaac and Notting Hill Movies Ltd (2011). [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 6:25 am by Linda Hazelton
Elizabeth Isaac The Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in the Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 12:15 pm by NARF
Police Chief Isaac Lujan and Police Captain Will Duran (Jurisdiction) U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:19 pm by Laurel Davis
House; it was two years before he would argue passionately for the survival of Dartmouth College in Trustees of Dartmouth College v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
For object lessons, Alan recommended a recent episode of Lawfare's own daily Lawfare Podcast focused on Moore v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:30 am by Meredith Ervine
In light of the ruling of the District Court for the Northern District of Alabama in National Small Business United v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:53 pm by Greg Engle
   before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, testimony was heard from the following witnesses: Brenda V. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 12:04 pm by Giles Peaker
Dunward Properties Ltd v Isaac (2022) EWHC 3276 (Ch) This was an appeal from a first instance decision on Mr Isaac’s claim in breach of contract, nuisance and derogation from grant after his landlord had permitted a change of use to the commercial property below his flat from an estate agents to a bar restaurant. [read post]
4 May 2007, 10:47 am
The knowledge requirement shows that the supervisor is not vicariously liable for a supervised person's fraud.In Isaacs, Carol v. [read post]