Search for: "J T Sullivan" Results 121 - 140 of 606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2008, 12:05 pm
As is often the case when we do our LexBlogosphere post later in the day, today's update features some voices we don't normally hear from...the publishing schedules just don't overlap. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 10:09 pm
  "If I didn't like him, I wouldn't have any problem throwing the book at him," this judge didn't say, but might as well have.But the Council did vote that Sullivan should be suspended for 15 days - even though Sullivan no longer holds any position from which he could be suspended. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:50 am by Theo Francis
 It’s also worth noting that this isn’t the first time we’ve footnoted Sullivan’s pay. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
Starmer said: “[The consultation] applies to social media, to online reporting, and one of the things we have not done in the guidelines, is to define journalists, because that’s not easy to define and we didn’t want to run into problems of definition“. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:47 am
Sullivan, J., would deny transfer, believing the opinion of the Court of Appeals in this case to be correct. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
That said, it’s not foolproof because it: relies on unedited copies of the media already being online doesn’t search the entire web doesn’t always allow filtering by publication time. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 10:44 am by Ruth Levush
However, the project didn’t succeed and Burkli moved back to Zurich. [read post]