Search for: "J. G.1" Results 121 - 140 of 4,350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2022, 10:27 am by Giorgio Luceri
PermaKat Neil Wilkof provides the answer with a link to the book publishing project "The Family Shakespeare" by Thomas and Henrietta Maria Bowdler.PATENTSThere have been two referrals (consolidated) to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) on the question of the EPO's joint application approach to priority for PCT(EP) applications (G 1/22 and G 2/22). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court and of the European Court of Human Rights, (Quaderni di Diritto e Politica Ecclesiastica 1, 2013).Peter G. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:30 am by Rose Hughes
 An interesting question following G 1/22 is the potential consequences for the Broad Institute's CRISPR cases. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 7:46 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The Board concludes that 'the principle of good faith / protection of legitimate expectations applies: 'Users must not suffer a disadvantage as a result of having relied on erroneous information received from the EPO (G 2/97, point 4.1 of the Reasons). [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am by Oliver G. Randl
Only claims 1 to 15 were searched. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Historical Note: This Comment was revised in 2010 to account for the amendment of subsections (f) and (g)(1) and the addition of subsection (g)(2), amendments that were necessitated by the approval of the Uniform Real Property Transfer on Death Act (2009), which is codified in this Code at Article VI, Part 4. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In this regard the Board points out that this wording of R 36(1) EPC is identical to the wording of the former R 25(1) EPC 1973 and, therefore, the corresponding case law can be taken into account.[6] The present Board agrees with the statement of the Legal Board of Appeal in decision J 18/04 that the term “pending earlier European patent application” in R 25 EPC 1973 did not establish a time limit having a point in time at which the pending status of an… [read post]