Search for: "J.M., Matter of" Results 121 - 140 of 161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2011, 7:28 am by Beth Graham
., 198 S.W.3d 778, 781 (Tex. 2006) (per curiam) (citing J.M. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[28]  Because the twins fit into these portions of ICWA, the issues for determination by the Court were whether the state law definition of “domicile” should control, and whether under the ICWA definition of “domicile” the twins were non-domiciliaries on the reservation.[29]  The Supreme Court recognized that the language of ICWA does not define “domicile;” and that the definition is a matter of Congressional intent.[30]  The Court… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[28]  Because the twins fit into these portions of ICWA, the issues for determination by the Court were whether the state law definition of “domicile” should control, and whether under the ICWA definition of “domicile” the twins were non-domiciliaries on the reservation.[29]  The Supreme Court recognized that the language of ICWA does not define “domicile;” and that the definition is a matter of Congressional intent.[30]  The Court… [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 8:12 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0202, 2010 MT 208N, IN THE MATTER OF: J.M., A Youth in Need of Care. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:15 pm by Rosalind English
The Court considered that J.M. could compare her situation to that of an absent parent who had formed a new relationship with a person of the opposite sex. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 8:18 am by Donald Barbati
On June 3, 2010, the Appellate Division decided In the Matter of Torres Mayfield, Docket No.: A-2969-08T1. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:58 am
 According to a story on files kept on the writer J.M. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:17 am
’s immediate return to duty, plus back pay and restoration of leave credits,* as the employer did not show there were “exceptional circumstances” requiring immediate placement of J.M. on involuntary leave pursuant to §72.5 of the Civil Service Law.Judge Richard said that J.M. [read post]
21 May 2010, 8:50 am by We Don't Judge - We Defend
J.M., 35 FLW 1103, 3RD DCA, Juveniles - Statement of juvenile in which he revealed his date of birth that was relevant to the case was properly admitted even if given pre-Miranda. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 9:34 am by Anastasia
Hippocampus. 16:1091-1101.http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/Maguire/Maguire2006.pdfSchwartz, J.M. and S. [read post]