Search for: "JANES v. JANES"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,816
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2023, 5:29 pm
Callender Cableworks Bank Jane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (Recorder Amanda Michaels) Prysmian Cables & Systems Ltd v Apple International and others [2023] EWHC 2176 (IPEC) (7 Sept 2023)The reason why there is a photo of a brass band is that the band consisted of members of staff at the Erith Works of the Callender Cable & Construction Co. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am
Historically speaking, prominent authors, like William Shakespeare and Jane Austen, have used gender neutral pronouns in their writing. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:52 am
Ohio) in Doe 1 v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:46 am
In the case of Jane Doe v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:49 am
Case Study: The SEC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:24 am
One of the earliest examples is Hahn v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:24 pm
One of the earliest examples is Hahn v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:07 am
See Doe v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 9:03 am
Burke V. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am
In S.B.B. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:29 pm
Etihad StadiumAuthor Cléria De Souza Licence CC BY 2.0 Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Meade) AIM Sport Vision AG v Supponor Ltd and another [2023] EWHC 164 (Pat) (30 Jan 2023)In AIM Sport Vision AG v Supponor Ltd and another [2023] EWHC 164 (Pat) (30 Jan 2023), the claimant, AIM Sport Vision ("AIM"), accused the defendants, Supponor OY and Supponor Ltd. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:37 am
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
Stickman IV's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 11:00 pm
”In the absence of any prejudice, and because the defendants couldn't identify any reason why Jane's true identity needed to be publicly disclosed, the underlying determination was left undisturbed.In other words, there will be no name-dropping here ….# # #DECISIONRoe v Harborfields Cent. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 11:54 pm
Author Judicial Office UK Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Zacaroli) Parsons v Convatec Ltd [2023] EWHC 1535 (Pat) (26 June 2023)This was an application by an employer to strike out or summarily dismiss part of its employee's claim for compensation under s.40 of the Patents Act 1977. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 11:10 am
“The Family Roe: Joshua Prager on his epic investigation of ‘An American Story’ — the complex life and family background of Norma McCorvey (aka Jane Roe in Roe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 10:19 am
Some excerpts from Sandmann v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Judge Jane Triche Milazzo's opinion in Rogers v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 4:29 am
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Arnold and Stuart-Smith and Lady Justice Falk) Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and another v Astellas Pharma Inc [2023] EWCA Civ 880 (25 July 2023) This was an appeal against the dismissal of the claim by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Teva UK Ltd. [read post]
