Search for: "JOHN DOE AND PREDECESSORS" Results 121 - 140 of 766
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” The court did not address the constitutionality of HB 454, but the ruling does allow litigation to resume. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
Untimely declaration Did the accused infringer argue that the patent enforcer (or its predecessor) did not disclose the SEP to the SSO until after the standard was adopted? [read post]
If the archivist does not agree, Subsection 2203(d) requires the president to provide a disposal schedule to “the appropriate Congressional Committees” 60 days in advance of destroying the records. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Or, more boldly, don’t lie about the law.Seen in this light, the evolution of John Roberts does look a fair bit like a man standing still while the landscape moves past him (and to the right). [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 2:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
There is a long tradition of administrations not using the Justice Department to investigate their predecessors. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 10:07 am by Catherine Reach
However, the use of such names, as well as designations such as “Law Offices of John Doe,” “Smith and Associates,” and “Jones Law Firm” are useful means of identification and are permissible without registration with the State Bar. [read post]
According to John Buckley, who served as one of Levi’s special assistants at the department and worked on some of the speeches, Levi wrote them himself—working on each with one of his special assistants. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Bars Release of Trump White House Records to House Jan. 6 Committee MSN – Spencer Hsu (Washington Post) | Published: 11/11/2021 A federal appeals court blocked the imminent release of records of former President Trump’s White House calls and activities related to the January 6 Capitol attack after a lower court found President Biden can waive his predecessor’s claim to executive privilege. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am by Michael Stern
Does the incumbent president’s decision on executive privilege always trump (so to speak) that of the former president and, if so, does the court have any role in reviewing a disagreement between the incumbent and former presidents on that issue? [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 3:40 am by David Kopel
Mullins was convicted of "making an Assault upon one John Jew," and also c [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Not selling it does not mean that it is not within their complete control to do so, nor does the fact that their increased wealth is on paper. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Not selling it does not mean that it is not within their complete control to do so, nor does the fact that their increased wealth is on paper. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Big Tech Sweeps Up Hill Staffers – Just When Congress Needs Them the Most MSN – Emily Birnbaum and John Hendel (Politico) | Published: 10/12/2021 Silicon Valley and the telecommunications industry are snatching up some of the top Democratic policy experts on Capitol Hill just as Congress gears up for fights with the companies. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm by David Kopel
For example, the First Amendment freedom of speech and of the press does not prohibit laws against libel; the Fifth Amendment prohibition on double jeopardy does not forbid retrial after a hung jury; that Amendment's prohibition on compelled self-incrimination does not apply if the relevant statute of limitations has expired. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
But the memo does not explore other reasons that at least some enrollees would leave the program. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 11:24 am
As does the re-centering of analysis of our "liebe herr" in the form of Afghanistan, whose own fractured but quite assertive character(s) deserves the respect of a equally brutal assessment. [read post]