Search for: "Jack D" Results 121 - 140 of 4,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2023, 4:01 am
The Board recently decided three Section 2(d) oppositions in which it held oral arguments in August 2023. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:44 am by Seán Binder
Jack Nicas reports for the New York Times. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am by Jacob Wirz
This post is the concluding essay by the authors for a symposium published over at the Balkinization blog on the topic of “The Chevron Doctrine through the Lens of Comparative Law. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
[We'll give you an answer within 14 days, and we can publish them within several weeks, if you'd like.] [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization Symposium on The Chevron Doctrine through the Lens of Comparative LawSusan Rose-Ackerman & Oren Tamir Over the past two weeks, the Balkinization blog hosted a wide-ranging symposium about judicial deference to the statutory interpretations of administrative agencies (or the executive more broadly) around the world. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
The Judge found for the claimant Jack Aaronson, an adult entertainment entrepreneur, in a libel claim against the defendant Marcus Stones, a former adult entertainer, who had published several tweets and featured in a YouTube video alleging the claimant was a serial rapist. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 2:21 am by Jack Sharman
Jack Sharman | Lightfoot, Franklin & White LLC How do you describe your practice? [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 5:57 am by Bob Ambrogi
One other minor suggestion I’d make for next year is to add an option in the app for seeing the full daily schedule. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm by Evan George
“Using embossed stationary I’d received for Christmas, I wrote Uncle Jack requesting an appointment to air my concerns,” he recalled. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:42 am
TTABlog Test: Which of These Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Reversed? [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Trump Fights Jack Smith Request for Narrow Gag Order in Jan. 6 Case MSN – Spencer Hsu and Amy Gardner (Washington Post) | Published: 9/25/2023 Attorneys for former President Trump blasted federal prosecutors’ request for a narrow gag order that would bar him from attacking participants in the criminal case charging him with conspiring to overturn the 2020 presidential election, claiming he must be free to campaign for the Republican nomination in 2024. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 10:39 am by Mark Tushnet
How might you react to Jack Balkin’s suggestions (including his earlier discussion)? [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
It was like arguing a piracy case with Captain Jack Sparrow sitting on the jury. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Special counsel Jack Smith’s team said in a motion that such a “narrow, well-defined” order was necessary to preserve the integrity of the case and to avoid prejudicing potential jurors. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 11:06 am by Bob Ambrogi
I’d say that among yesterday’s attendees, the verdict is still very much out on that question. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 2:30 am by Rob Entin, FordHarrison
The post <strong>EntertainHR: Don’t Be Punk’d Without a Workplace Violence Policy</strong> appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 2:31 am by Seán Binder
Luc Cohen and Jack Queen report for Reuters. [read post]