Search for: "James Davis v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
We asked the 2018-19 Davis Fellows the following question: how has your time at the Davis Center led to new insights about the reach and limits of law and legalities? [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:04 am by Jordan Brunner
  Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:36 am by Sarnata Reynolds
Learn more about United States immigration and related human rights abuses by reading Amnesty’s report,  Jailed Without Justice. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:22 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeSentences in $100 Million Fraud Scheme Rejected; Errors, Misinterpretation of §3553(c) Factors Noted United States, appellant v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
Justice James Iredell died at the age of forty-eight from the toll of riding the Southern Circuit four times in five years, including trips to New York City, which was then the capital of the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:38 am by Minick Law
Highlights: $ Listen as Jake discusses the United States Supreme Court case of Heien v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:38 am by Minick Law
Highlights: $ Listen as Jake discusses the United States Supreme Court case of Heien v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:04 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES William E. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Jay Willis
” At Newsweek, Krista Gesaman has a preview of Snyder v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
The motion, tabled by David Davis MP, calls for an “end [to] this serious attack on free speech by withdrawing the proceedings for contempt; further asserts the fundamental right of hon. [read post]