Search for: "James v. Bailey"
Results 121 - 140
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) James Earl Brown v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
" In James Kohlmeyer v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
We affirm. 08a0184p.06 2008/05/16 Bailey v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:44 am
" Stephanie Bailey v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Defendant-Appellant James Edward Klups ("Klups") contests on appeal his sentence to a sixty-month prison term for travel with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
Meredith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Box 1028 Rhinelander, WI 54501 Phone: (715) 365-2525 Web: http://www.bfm.org/naaa Bureau of Aging & Long Term Care Resources 217 South Hamilton Street, Suite 300 Madison, WI 53703 Phone: (608) 266-2536; (608) 267-3201; (800) 242-1060 (Toll Free) ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Great Lakes ADA and Accessible IT Center University of Illinois/Chicago Institute on Disability and Human Development 1640 West Roosevelt Road Chicago, IL 60608 Phone: (312) 413-1407… [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:40 am
Attorneys for Bd. of Zoning Appeals: James Osborn , Ian Stewart, Indianapolis, IN. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 9:52 am
State of Indiana (NFP) James Drain v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:38 am
James R. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 4:46 am
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Judges Darden, Bailey and Robb. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:57 am
Shockley, James R. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:13 am
For publication opinions today (2): In James Atterholt v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 11:16 am
We affirm the first ruling of the trial court denying Bosley permission to file a belated direct appeal.In James Lile d/b/a Lile's Body Shop and Trailer Sales v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
Knight v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:16 pm
" NFP civil opinions today (2): James Quincy Calloway v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
As noted in the majority opinion, any doubts as to coverage are construed against the insurer.In James Peel v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 11:01 am
" James H. [read post]
19 May 2007, 4:20 pm
Curtis v. [read post]
