Search for: "James v. Roberts" Results 121 - 140 of 2,520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am by Bill Marler
, Stx1, Stx2, Stx2c), and acts like the plant toxin ricin by inhibiting protein synthesis in endothelial and other cells. [16]   Endothelial cells line the interior surface of blood vessels and are known to be extremely sensitive to E. coliO157:H7, which is cytotoxigenic to these cells. [16] In addition to Shiga toxin, E. coli O157:H7 produces numerous other putative virulence factors, including proteins which aid in the attachment and colonization of the… [read post]
29 May 2023, 7:15 am by Karina Lytvynska
Both Roberts and Edwards acknowledge those who have influenced their work in interviews: Roberts thanks scholars like James Baldwin for influencing her work, and Edwards calls her work “Faith Ringgold inspired. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am by Eric Goldman
(The defense team included lawyers from Jaburg & Wilk, Wilenchik & Bartness, and the Law Office of Robert W Shely). [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
This article begins, in Part One, with a consideration of the Roberts Court’s recent jurisprudence, focusing on three landmark opinions issued in June of 2022: Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Kennedy v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 9 May 2023, Nicklin J continued to hear the trial in the case of MBR Acres Ltd v Free MBR Beagles and Saini J continued to hear the trial in Packham CBE v Wightman and ors. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  ICYMI: R v Penguin Books Ltd: When Lady Chatterley’s Lover was Put on Trial (The Collector). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm by Josh Blackman
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Monday's Fourth Circuit opinions from Judges Robert King, Marvin Quattlebaum, and Henry Floyd (Smith v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by Eric Columbus
He points to the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Trump v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am by Seán Binder
  Former President Trump is expected to sit for a deposition in a civil lawsuit filed by New York Attorney General Letitia James this week. [read post]