Search for: "James v. United States (two Cases)" Results 121 - 140 of 2,817
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2020, 2:05 pm by Daniel Harawa
Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics­ — which allows individuals to sue federal officials for violating their constitutional rights — and claims against the United States under Section 1346(b) of the Federal Tort Claims Act — which allows individuals to sue the United States for civil wrongs under relevant state tort law committed by federal employees. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 8:36 am by Judge Alan F. Pendleton (Retired)
The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
James (1971) – Michele Estrin GilmanA Tragedy of Two Americas: Jefferson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
 That is the central reason why James Madison, seconded by James Wilson, first moved on June 1 that the Executive be vested with the power “to appoint to offices in cases not otherwise provided for. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am by Rohini Kurup
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Even metaphorically, this does not describe James Madison’s relation to the United States Constitution. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 11:55 am by Thomas James
The United States Constitution, however, also protects rights of speech and press freedom. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 3:56 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
In that case, Defendant pleaded guilty to being unlawfully present in the United States after being deported for an aggravated felony conviction. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 8:04 am by Adam Schlossman
This morning, the Court issued orders from the Justices’ March 18 Conference, granting certiorari in two cases, inviting the views of the United States in one case, releasing a summary decision in one case, and providing a written statement respecting the denial of certiorari in one case. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am by Kiran Bhat
” In today’s second case, United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:03 am by Marty Lederman
§ 7, the United States has recently taken the position that classifications based on sexual orientation should be subjected to heightened scrutiny. [read post]