Search for: "Jammie Thomas-Rasset" Results 121 - 140 of 247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 1:52 pm by Ben Sheffner
(Note that all three juries to have sat in individual peer-to-peer cases have awarded much higher than that: $9,250 (Thomas-Rasset #1); $80,000 (Thomas-Rasset #2); and $22,500 (Joel Tenenbaum).) [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm
Jammie Thomas-Rasset fue la primera demandada en Estados Unidos por violación a derechos de autor al compartir y descargar música en el sitio Kazza. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 9:12 am by Ben Sheffner
Last summer, when Kiwi Camara and Joe Sibley took over the defense of Jammie Thomas-Rasset, they vowed not only to get her off the hook, but to launch a counter-attack to "get the $100 million that [the labels] stole" in the course of their litigation campaign against individual peer-to-peer users. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 9:33 am by Jonathan Bailey
No specific amount was listed but Thomas-Rasset has said that she’s not interested and would rather go bankrupt. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:45 pm
Jammie Thomas-Rasset must pay $62,500 for each of the 24 songs at issue in the case, for total of $1.5 million. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 2:28 am
" Here's how:Liability-Reproduction rightPlaintiffs failed to introduce an iota of evidence that Jammie Thomas-Rasset had made a single copy using Kazaa. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:59 am
Today at the Progress & Freedom Foundation's blog, Tom Sydnor takes on Techdirt's numerous misstatements and mischaracterizations of the law regarding statutory damages, as well as the facts of the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 7:30 am
Allow us, LBers, if you will, to circle back to a case to which we gave rather short shrift last week: the one involving the 32 year-old Minnesota woman, Jammie Thomas-Rasset, who was ordered by a jury last Thursday to cough up $1.92 million as a penalty for downloading 24 songs. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:01 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Feds Urge Supreme Court to Let Stand $222K Landmark File-Sharing Verdict First off today, David Kravets at Wired reports that the Obama administration, on Monday, filed a petition with the Supreme Court urging it to let stand the $222,000 verdict against file sharer Jammie Thomas-Rasset. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:57 am
From cnet news: Jammie Thomas-Rasset was found guilty of willful copyright infringement on Thursday in a Minneapolis  federal court and must pay the recording industry $1.92 million. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:24 am by Elie Mystal
Professor Charlie NessonTomorrow, Jammie Thomas-Rasset goes to trial for a third time over her illegal downloads of 24 songs. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:29 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Jammie Thomas Rasset  (Case No. 11-2820), the appellate court assessed the defendant $9,250 for each of 24 copyrighted '80s and '90s hits she downloaded, ranging from Green Day's Basket Case to Journey's Don't Stop Believin'. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 1:05 pm
She was asked to point out some copyright notices on CD jewel cases and listen to both an MP3 version MediaSentry acquired and a retail version of one of Warner's songs at issue in this case.During her testimony the three Warner certified copyright registration certificates and CDs were moved into evidence.The final direct question was whether or not Warner authorized Jammie Thomas-Rasset to distribute their works, to which she testified that they did not.The cross… [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 10:29 am
The problem is that Jammie Thomas-Rasset has already been tried twice. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 9:23 am
After the June verdict against Jammie Thomas-Rasset, defense attorneys urged U.S. [read post]