Search for: "Jane Doe II" Results 121 - 140 of 280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2007, 9:10 pm
Jane Doe, a/k/a Diane Nomad, 968 F.2d 86 (D.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 6:21 am by Marty Lederman
"Even if Justice Kennedy does not support the government's "substantial burden" argument, however, that hardly resolves the case. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 8:34 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The underlying dispute concerned minor Jane Doe's attempt to obtain a judicial bypass so as to obtain an abortion without notice to her parents. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 10:40 am by Eugene Volokh
The facts (some paragraph breaks added): Shortly [after starting at GMU in August 2012], plaintiff began a romantic relationship with a woman — referred to pseudonymously as Jane Roe — who was a student at a different university. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 am
The default rule excluding hearsay is, as I again noted in that post, based on simple fairness: If hearsay weren't excluded, Jane Doe could take the stand at Sam Smith's trial for murder and tell the jury that Stan Ford had told her (Jane) that Sam committed the murder Sam's on trial for. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:27 pm by admin
But, does it matter whether it’s law as activism or reaction? [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:56 am by elizabethw
  The Early English Laws website has a freely available overview of the Forest Law by Jane Winters  as well as a digital copy of the Assize of Woodstock 1184/5, also often referred to as Henry II’s Assize of the Forest most well-known iteration of the working of the system. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
Historically, the courts have also recognized that the legal process does not apply in the same fashion to the president, as it does to other government officials. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 8:28 am by Yishai Schwartz
Jane suggests that the decision has far-reaching implications for the development and understanding of habeas. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
Paris II; the Honorable Diane Wood (far right), Judge, U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 2:11 pm
.; (3) the Indian services firm's U.S. affiliate, Acumen Solutions, LLC; and (4) John and Jane Doe defendants. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner, Amira Mikhail
Four of the plaintiffs (Paul Harrison, two John Does, and a Jane Doe) claim that Section 2(c) of the E.O. will “prolong their separation from their loved ones,” by preventing them from obtaining visas, while “several” of the plaintiffs claim that the anti-Muslim animus in the executive caused them “feelings of disparagement and exclusion. [read post]