Search for: "Jeffrey S. II v. Jeffrey S." Results 121 - 140 of 411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2015, 3:53 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Jeffrey Stempel looks back at Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm by Jackie McDermott
Professor John Yoo of Berkeley Law and Professor Alison LaCroix of University of Chicago Law School joined host Jeffrey Rosen on We the People to reflect on those questions, and lend their expertise on Article II presidential powers and federalism as prescribed by the 10th Amendment. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 11:16 am by Jordan Brunner
Josh Blackman examined the flaws in the Article II analysis of Judge Roger Gregory concurring opinion in IRAP v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
Here are a few preliminary thoughts about the Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:21 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
If you are the victim of Massachusetts product liability, call the Law Offices of Jeffrey S. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:21 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
If you are the victim of Massachusetts product liability, call the Law Offices of Jeffrey S. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 2:52 pm
” Under the Supreme Court’s precedent in Edmond v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am by cdw
December 1 Steven Staley* (Tex) (forcible medication & Ford) Executions October 6    Michael Benge* (Ohio) 14  Donald Wackerly II* (Okla) 21  Larry Wooten* (Tex) 26  Jeffrey Landrigen* (Az) November 4  Phillip Halford* (Ala) *”serious” execution date / (s) stay believed likely / (V) Volunteer / note this list may erroneously exclude some dates [via DPIC] [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  On Tuesday, the Court will explore whether the Constitution gave Congress the power to impose such a “mandate.” A highly respected federal judge who ultimately concluded that Congress did have the authority to adopt the mandate as written, Circuit Judge Jeffrey S. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:10 am
The court finds no error in the magistrate judge's denial of defendant Reibert's motion for a Franks hearing.U.S. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am by John Jascob
In the 2014 case of Halliburton II, the Supreme Court re-affirmed the Basic v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]