Search for: "Jeremy Strong v. State"
Results 121 - 135
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm
In this case there’s a fairly strong argument that the 27-second clip of Bouchard is fair. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Chamberlain Professor of Legislation, Columbia Law School Jeremy Creelan, Partner, Jenner & Block, LLP, former Deputy Director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
Both Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill were passionately interested in the lives of animals and both thought that human treatment of animals was ethically unacceptable. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:46 am
District Judge Jeremy Fogel called the state's "pervasive lack of professionalism" in carrying out executions "deeply disturbing. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 5:17 am
Provisions of the Bill were incorporated against the states with ridiculous casualness in cases like Gitlow and Cantwell v CT. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
So… to calm things down, I am able to state that there are no known ‘unusual antics’ being reported by Martin George and colleagues at Conflict of Laws.net, by Jeremy Philips and colleagues at IPKat (Intellectual property) or Alex and his colleagues over at IMPACT; an excellent law rich blog by leading Midlands firm, Freeth Cartwright. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:38 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Jeremy Miller v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Sapp)................................................12, 32Kohler, Jeremy, Behind the Mask of theExecution Doctor, St. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 9:02 pm
The Electronic Frontier Foundation quotes the decision in McIntyre v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
It was introduced into US state law nearly 30 years ago and the first execution by this method was in 1982. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:16 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Jeremy Tidmore v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 5:41 am
MacKinnon v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 9:44 pm
KSR v. [read post]
15 Jul 2006, 7:32 am
But, like a lot of conservatives, he was so irritated by the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
