Search for: "John Doe 1 "
Results 121 - 140
of 12,863
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
Does 1-22, targeting Rhode Island College students, and BMG Music v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:06 am
Does 1-27, the case targeting University of Maine students, additional papers have been filed by the plaintiffs and by the "John Doe" defendants in connection with the students' motion to dismiss, referencing the decision from the District of Connecticut in Atlantic v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 1:14 am
A George Washington University student, known only as "John Doe #3", has made a motion to vacate the RIAA's ex parte discovery order, quash the subpoena issued pursuant to the order, and to dismiss the complaint, in Arista v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 11:18 am
Does 1-5, the case targeting 5 Northern Michigan University students, the judge has denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint and quash the subpoena.February 22, 2008, order denying motion to dismiss and to quash** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->[][][][]-->Keywords: digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file… [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 1:59 am
The motion of Ohio State University students "John Does 5 and 9", in Arista v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 6:03 am
Does 1-16, a "John Doe" case targeting students at the State University of New York at Albany, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has issued a stay of the RIAA subpoena and all proceedings during the pendency of John Doe #3's appeal.This is a case in which several John Does had moved to quash the subpoena, vacate the ex parte discovery order, and dismiss the complaint.The motion to vacate, quash, and… [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:22 am
John Doe, 2013 WL 363016 (9thCir. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:16 pm
Hammond, Indiana -- Copyright lawyers for TCYK LLC of Los Angeles, CA sued for copyright infringement in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that John Does 1-9, all allegedly located in Indiana, infringed the copyrighted work "The Company You Keep," which has been registered by the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 10:21 am
Does 1-5, a BitTorrent downloading case, the plaintiff has filed papers opposing defendant John Doe #4's motion to dismiss, sever, and quash.The motion papers include a declaration by a "forensic investigator", employed by a company in Germany, who makes claims about the technology he uses.Plaintiff's memorandum of law in oppositionDeclaration of Tobias FieserExhibit AExhibit B Commentary & discussion:Slashdot var addthis_config =… [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:25 am
Readers may recall that in the RIAA's "John Doe" case against 38 North Carolina State University students in Raleigh, North Carolina, LaFace v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:43 am
Does 1-2094 was filed on March 18, 2010, in the District of Columbia. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 5:40 am
A new "John Doe" case named Arista v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:58 am
Indiana John Does 1-18. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 10:39 am
John Does 1-11, District Judge Joseph F. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 2:37 am
John’s Law community. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 11:10 am
Does 1-22, a case targeting students at Rhode Island College.In Arista Records v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:06 am
Does 1-16, the case targeting students at the University of New Mexico, Magistrate Judge Garcia issued an order which required the RIAA to:--provide full sets of papers for each John Doe defendant, and--give the defendants 40 days in which to review the papers with their counsel, and, if so advised, to oppose discovery.September 9, 2007, Order, Requiring 40 days Notice and Full Sets of Papers for John Doe defendants** Document published online at… [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:31 am
Does 1-90, a mass John Doe case based on alleged BitTorrent downloads of a movie, pending in the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, the Court, by Hon. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 4:21 pm
Does 1-4, after the university advised the Court that it could not identify John Does #8, 9, and 14 to a reasonable degree of technical certainty, Judge Nancy Gertner deemed the letter a motion to quash, and granted it, quashing the subpoena as to those defendants:The Court treats Boston University's 9/23/08 Letter as a Motion to Quash and GRANTS the motion with respect to Doe Defendants # 8, 9, and 14. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:37 am
Does 1-27, the Judge has denied all of the defendants' motions, and ruled that the case may proceed.The Judge agreed with the RIAA on every legal issue presented.October 29, 2008, decision*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music… [read post]
