Search for: "John Doe Corporations, 1-10" Results 121 - 140 of 1,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 6:56 am
If the real problem is the ability of corporations to avoid significant regulation and remedies aimed at controlling their impacts on human rights, assigning them international responsibility does little (if anything) on its own to address that problem. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
From Australia,9 the United Kingdom (UK),10 and the European Union (EU),11 national security is increasingly cited as the legal basis to undertake action restricting trade and foreign investment:Europe is pushing for more stringent vetting of foreign investments, with an eye on Beijing. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:25 am
  [1]  Although campaign finance regulation has taken numerous forms throughout the years, loopholes and exceptions inevitably surface despite the intentions of Congress. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Yet, it does not justify an interpretation of the Constitution that tolerates let alone sustains corporate infringement of individual rights and encroachment on governmental powers. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
John Elwood briefly reviews the likely relists. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:36 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
John Does 1-10 (Case No. 2:11-cv-03700), filed this week in the U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Bernie Sanders says he does not want a super PAC. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:00 am by Simmons Hanly Conroy
It’s a record that still stands today — as does John’s founding mission to put clients first. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 6:00 pm by Simmons Hanly Conroy
It’s a record that still stands today — as does John’s founding mission to put clients first. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:46 pm
XYZ Company Nos. 1-25 et al Texas Western District Court Filed: March 10, 2008 Plaintiff: NetSpend Corporation Defendant: XYZ Company Nos. 1-25, John/Jane Does 1-25 Case Number: 1:2008cv00196 Monterey Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:34 pm
For any questions or more information on these or any related matters, please contact Louis Lehot, Kevin Rooney, John Tishler or Camille Formosa. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Indeed, Section 11 is basically a strict liability provision with regard to the corporate issuer. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 8:33 am by John Jascob
They also foresee increased requirements for cybersecurity and 10b5-1 trading plans.The panel took place September 23, 2021 at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law’s Garrett Institute and Corporate Counsel Virtual Institute. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:08 pm
It signaled what appeared to be the ending of a long arc of development with the abandonment of the project to produce a Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights (the “Norms”).[1] It was also the year that saw the announcement of the appointment of John Ruggie as Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and… [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:53 am
”  [7]   The first case that held promise that corporation might be held liable under the ATCA was Doe v Unocal, but this corporation also settled with the plaintiffs before it could be heard before the full en banc court that was requested by judges in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relisted and held cases. [read post]