Search for: "John Doe Inc 1-2"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2015, 9:10 pm
I/P Engine, Inc., at *2. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:48 pm
Cahill which requires (1) that the anonymous party sought to be unmask be given notice of the proceedings, and (2) that the party seeking the identity of the anonymous party put forth sufficient facts to survive a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:20 am
This posting was written by John W. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 12:36 pm
Multistate E. coli O26 Outbreak, Jimmy John’s Restaurants Alfalfa Sprouts 2012 29 Sickened – A total of 29 individuals infected with the outbreak strain of E. coli O26 were reported from 11 states, including: Alabama (1), Arkansas (1), Iowa (5), Kansas (2), Michigan (10), Missouri (3), Ohio (3), Pennsylvania (1), Washington (1), Wisconsin (1), and West Virginia (1). [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:10 am
CO., Inc., Serial No. 85035510 [Refusal to register ARROZ VALENCIA G & Design for "enriched rice; rice; rice flour" [ARROZ disclaimed], on the ground that the mark is deceptive under Section 2(a) because Applicant's rice does not include rice of the "Valencia" type]. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:40 am
AMF, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 10:39 am
By John Ottaviani Doe v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 2:37 pm
Transaction Tracking Technologies, Inc., 2:07cv311 (Ed. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 7:36 am
Logistick, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 12:11 am
" The Board found the design to be functional under Section 2(e)(5), and alternatively found that it fails to function as a mark, under Sections 1, 2, and 45. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 2:25 am
Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Trademark Act provide the statutory basis for a refusal to register subject matter that fails to function as a service mark. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 3:06 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 2:53 am
The Topps Company, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:01 am
In re DuraVent, Inc., Serial No. 90192019 (June 2, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
3 May 2021, 4:29 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 2:19 am
Trademark Rule 2.72(a)(2) provides that, in a Section 1(a) application, an applicant may amend the drawing of the mark if "[t]he proposed amendment does not materially alter the mark" as depicted in the application drawing. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:47 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 415 F. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:33 pm
By John S. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 9:01 pm
In re South Park Cigar, Inc., Serial No. 78486382 (February 1, 2007).In a well-reasoned and careful opinion, the Board began by pointing out that, under the CAFC's California Innovations decision, the proper basis for refusal of a geographically deceptive mark is not Section 2(a) but Section 2(e)(3). [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 2:33 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
