Search for: "John Doe v. Jane Doe" Results 121 - 140 of 460
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2019, 3:46 pm
  John and Jane have sex.Neither John nor Jane should be having sex; neither one is sufficiently sober to effectively consent. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am by Ronald Collins
There have been divergent applications of the theory in the same case, as exemplified by Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority opinion and Justice John Paul Stevens’ dissent in District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 3:30 pm by Renee Anderson
Does it really offer explanatory background usefully and specially directed to a readership envisioned to be the STEM community? [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:51 am by Eric Goldman
If the marketplaces remove the sale of Nazi paraphernalia, does that count against them for neutrality purposes? [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:22 am by Alex Nealon
John and Jane Does 1-100 United States District Court for the Northern District of California filed on June […] [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
I've recently started looking into anonymous "John Doe" (or "Jane Doe") litigation; generally speaking, people are presumptively required to sue in their own names, but sometimes courts allow them to sue anonymously. [read post]
27 May 2019, 8:51 pm by Greg
Similarly, a person charged with a state jail felony prostitution case (who does does not a previous conviction for that state jail offense) must be placed on probation. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Beyer & Brooke Dacus, Estate Planning for Mary Jane and Other Marijuana Users, PROB. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate Blog offers a Q&A about the cases with law professor Jane Schacter. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Jane Doe 2, 18-677, and Trump v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Jane McMillan is the former Canada Research Chair for Indigenous Peoples and Sustainable Communities and chair of the Department of Anthropology at St. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:09 am by Eugene Volokh
USC's procedures didn't fairly treat the accused, a California appellate court rules.From Tuesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Doe v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am by Anushka Limaye
Thursday, Dec. 6 at 9:30 a.m.: CSIS will host a conversation with Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:00 pm by John Dean
Also, it is not clear to me if Judge Kavanaugh does or does not believe U.S. v Nixon (the 8-0 holding that ended Nixon’s presidency, forcing him to provide prosecutors incriminating secretly recorded conversations) was correctly decided.My second general point is a very important process matter. [read post]