Search for: "John Does # 1 -5" Results 121 - 140 of 8,773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2007, 10:06 am
Does 1-16, the case targeting students at the University of New Mexico, Magistrate Judge Garcia issued an order which required the RIAA to:--provide full sets of papers for each John Doe defendant, and--give the defendants 40 days in which to review the papers with their counsel, and, if so advised, to oppose discovery.September 9, 2007, Order, Requiring 40 days Notice and Full Sets of Papers for John Doe defendants** Document published online at… [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:38 pm
So understood, the John Doe proceeding does not fit into any of the categories for Younger abstention. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 7:54 am by Steve Vladeck
Thus, the more time passes in John Doe’s case without (1) knowing who he is; (2) providing him with access to counsel; or (3) allowing the courts to even review the legality of his detention, the more alarmed I am by the government’s conduct—and the more alarmed you (and Ben) should be, too. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 4:21 pm
Does 1-4, after the university advised the Court that it could not identify John Does #8, 9, and 14 to a reasonable degree of technical certainty, Judge Nancy Gertner deemed the letter a motion to quash, and granted it, quashing the subpoena as to those defendants:The Court treats Boston University's 9/23/08 Letter as a Motion to Quash and GRANTS the motion with respect to Doe Defendants # 8, 9, and 14. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:31 am by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-90, a mass John Doe case based on alleged BitTorrent downloads of a movie, pending in the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, the Court, by Hon. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:37 am
Does 1-27, the Judge has denied all of the defendants' motions, and ruled that the case may proceed.The Judge agreed with the RIAA on every legal issue presented.October 29, 2008, decision*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music… [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:45 am
Does 1-16, the case targeting students at the State University of New York in Albany, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has granted an interim stay of the subpoena calling for the identity of student "John Doe #3". [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:18 pm
Does 1-16, the John Doe case targeting students at the State University of New York at Albany, a third student has joined the two already fighting the RIAA's subpoena, and the students' attorney filed an amended memorandum of law which, among other things, incorporates the recent decision, handed down September 24, 2008, in Capitol v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00262-RLM-RBCFile Date: Friday, September 06, 2013Plaintiff: 80/20 IncPlaintiff Counsel: D Randall Brown of Barnes & Thornburg LLPDefendant: John DoeCause: Trademark Infringement, Passing OffCourt: Northern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Robert L. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:20 pm by Glo
The article from CBS 46 said that the crash happened around 1:10 Thursday afternoon. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:46 am
Does 1-16, a case against students at the State University of New York in Albany, John Doe #3 has moved to extend the stay previously granted by the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit.Defendant's motion to extend stay*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload… [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 9:09 pm by John Whitaker
Discount Video Center v Does 1-29 Answer Discount Video Center v Does 1 29 Complaint [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:56 am
Does 1-19, the District of Columbia case, being handled by Matthew Oppenheim personally, which targets students at George Washington University, the Court -- after reading the motion to quash filed by John Doe #3 -- has on its own initiative issued an Order to Show Cause ordering the plaintiffs to show cause, on or before November 29th:-why the defendant's motion should not be granted; and-why the Court's ruling should not be applicable to all of the… [read post]